From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
To: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
Cc: Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git describe bug?
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:48:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBB0377.8080007@op5.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100402183147.GA20007@spearce.org>
On 04/02/2010 08:31 PM, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> Dustin Sallings<dustin@spy.net> wrote:
>>
>> describe does not choose the most recent tag when multiple tags point to a single commit (for example, when an RC release becomes a proper release).
>>
>> There's a bit of conflict in the documentation between the following:
>>
>> ``tags with newer dates will always be preferred over tags with older dates''
>>
>> and the next sentence:
>>
>> ``If an exact match is found, its name will be output and searching will stop.''
>>
>> The code does not allow for multiple exact matches, leading to what I would consider incorrect behavior as shown below:
>
> Yes, I've seen this too. IIRC we've actually discussed this in
> the past. I can't find the thread (my search skills are sub-par
> despite who I work for...). But the general idea if I remember
> it right was we wanted to use the older tag, because that tag
> came first.
>
Right now the behaviour is inconsistent. In the latest git repo
I tried the following:
$ git tag -a v99 -msdf
$ git tag -a v100 -m100
$ git describe
v100
$ git describe v99
v100
$ git describe v100
v100
$ git show v99
tag v99
Tagger: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Date: Tue Apr 6 11:27:28 2010 +0200
sdf
commit 8b5fe8c9ec3f961ec9b09844eca6225f06af5b0b
...
$ git show v100
tag v100
Tagger: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Date: Tue Apr 6 11:27:37 2010 +0200
100
commit 8b5fe8c9ec3f961ec9b09844eca6225f06af5b0b
...
$ ls .git/refs/tags/v{100,99}
.git/refs/tags/v100 .git/refs/tags/v99
So as you can see, something else is going on. Both tags here are
stashed as loose objects and both refs are unpacked.
Using either strverscmp(3) or allowing one to sort by tagging date
with the option to use first or latest would be preferrable. I'll
see what I can cook up during my lunch-break.
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and
terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war
on peace.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-06 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-02 17:20 git describe bug? Dustin Sallings
2010-04-02 18:31 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2010-04-06 9:48 ` Andreas Ericsson [this message]
2010-04-11 0:28 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2010-04-11 1:54 ` [PATCH] describe: Break annotated tag ties by tagger date Shawn O. Pearce
2010-04-11 2:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-04-11 2:40 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2010-04-12 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] tag.c: Correct indentation Shawn O. Pearce
2010-04-12 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] tag.h: Remove unused signature field Shawn O. Pearce
2010-04-12 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] tag.c: Refactor parse_tag_buffer to be saner to program Shawn O. Pearce
2010-04-12 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] tag.c: Parse tagger date (if present) Shawn O. Pearce
2010-04-12 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] describe: Break annotated tag ties by tagger date Shawn O. Pearce
2010-04-13 9:27 ` Andreas Ericsson
2010-04-13 9:32 ` Thomas Rast
2010-04-13 14:08 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2010-04-13 19:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-04-13 19:46 ` Shawn O. Pearce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BBB0377.8080007@op5.se \
--to=ae@op5.se \
--cc=dustin@spy.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).