From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2010, #03; Wed, 07) Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:05:28 +0200 Message-ID: <4BBD7228.8080403@viscovery.net> References: <7v6342ahx9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 08 08:05:40 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nzkrz-0000bO-6Q for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:05:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754292Ab0DHGFe (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:05:34 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:5317 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751803Ab0DHGFd (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:05:33 -0400 Received: from cpe228-254.liwest.at ([81.10.228.254] helo=theia.linz.viscovery) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nzkrp-00045c-5g; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:05:29 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.95] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.95]) by theia.linz.viscovery (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82BA1660F; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:05:28 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <7v6342ahx9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 4/8/2010 2:48, schrieb Junio C Hamano: > * np/malloc-threading (2010-04-07) 2 commits > - Make xmalloc and xrealloc thread-safe (addendum) > - Make xmalloc and xrealloc thread-safe > > Updated with Freku's "init_recursive_mutex()". The fix should eventually > go to 'maint' and 'master'. The addendum does not compile on Windows. I'm working on a replacement. BTW, are there Unices that do not have a recursive mutex? -- Hannes