From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Lehmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v4' 1/2] gitk: do not parse " >" context as submodule change Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:05:32 +0200 Message-ID: <4BCDDEDC.7040507@web.de> References: <20100419010819.GA4386@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> <671110fcac73c5fc8a935b82d88f8553c510c50c.1271694102.git.trast@student.ethz.ch> <4BCC9164.3080301@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Rast , Paul Mackerras , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Lehmann X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 20 19:05:50 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O4GtQ-0000go-05 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:05:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754009Ab0DTRFl (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:05:41 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:52073 "EHLO fmmailgate02.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750957Ab0DTRFk (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:05:40 -0400 Received: from smtp06.web.de (fmsmtp06.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.172]) by fmmailgate02.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978FC15E42E39; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:05:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [80.128.80.210] (helo=[192.168.178.26]) by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #4) id 1O4GtF-0001sE-00; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:05:37 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <4BCC9164.3080301@web.de> X-Sender: Jens.Lehmann@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18iystheKR77B4JoADz1fdlJll2ZMyRTULzlpnd ZkmijT3xdN/2T42YpS0b3MOsqGRHAKzWZTJLW9A247lfUnc2Kb vQ0C3D5UDFBGAQ6VM9rA== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 19.04.2010 19:22, schrieb Jens Lehmann: > Am 19.04.2010 18:27, schrieb Thomas Rast: >>> Thanks, but now that I have applied Jens Lehmann's patch that also >>> touches this area, your patch doesn't apply. Could you rebase it and >>> send it again? >> >> Sure. > > There might be a problem with this rebase. Unfortunately I am very > short on time, so I can't test this today. I successfully tested this patch, this was a false alarm from my side. Sorry for the noise. Tested-by: Jens.Lehmann@web.de