From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael J Gruber Subject: Re: RFD: Shipping GitBrowser.js for instaweb Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 09:57:12 +0200 Message-ID: <4BDE81D8.8070505@drmicha.warpmail.net> References: <4BDDA780.7090500@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Git Mailing List To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 03 09:57:25 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O8qWm-0003Wr-VJ for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 03 May 2010 09:57:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932261Ab0ECH5P (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2010 03:57:15 -0400 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:33013 "EHLO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932153Ab0ECH5P (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2010 03:57:15 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5260F200A; Mon, 3 May 2010 03:57:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 03 May 2010 03:57:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=VUdIpmUf0A5ygY+9Z5ek1T+nJP8=; b=PL8BsqxbdLkrcIpu7sof2bHLfcpLVFaHKK7E5QpZSS5mVTsAm7tPB/DXrhbV/eerK+vWHKWRZKSEt3yo2o8J9J7fSx9cg/cFN2Caoqs5LHUcN3kGBGhWitnBChfqslnDvn//MZQMtOV6FOW+JKwmuRZeALheo/e91H+HIeKfLt4= X-Sasl-enc: jvla1q4UnAGs+pukLP9ZRpraPc8irBYy3xEGFv9zhSMR 1272873434 Received: from localhost.localdomain (whitehead.math.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.44.12]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C5E51ABCD; Mon, 3 May 2010 03:57:13 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.5pre) Gecko/20100429 Lightning/1.0b2pre Lanikai/3.1b2pre In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski venit, vidit, dixit 02.05.2010 22:14: > Michael J Gruber writes: > >> I was wondering whether it would make sense to ship GitBrowser.js with >> Git and how much it would take to do so. >> >> My personal answer to the 1st Q is Yes: instaweb as well as simple >> gitweb installs would benefit from a graphical DAG viewer. >> >> About the required effort I have no clue: I find it difficult to see >> through which repo contains current gitweb, current repo.or.cz mods, and >> especially the GitBrowser integration bits. Maybe we could ship the >> integration bits without the actual GitBrowser if that is more feasible? > > The integration parts are actually present in gitweb, I think. It is > a matter of configuration to enable 'graphiclog' link like in > http://repo.or.cz > > GitBrowser.js is not, I think, the best solution for having graphical > history in gitweb, but would do... After having a more thorough look at it I agree... We don't want to inflate $GIT_DIR/gitweb more than necessary. But what are the alternatives? Something svg/canvas would be nice, I guess. The ruby frontends with graphlog don't convince me at all (neither performance-wise nor layout-wise). Michael