From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Lehmann Subject: Re: git-status and git-diff now very slow in project with a submodule Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 19:49:41 +0200 Message-ID: <4BF57635.9090409@web.de> References: <4BF50A92.3060209@atlas-elektronik.com> <4BF55ACD.3060009@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Parkins X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 20 19:50:20 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OF9sx-0001Mc-Oi for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 19:50:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752613Ab0ETRuN (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 13:50:13 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:39339 "EHLO fmmailgate02.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752146Ab0ETRuL (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 13:50:11 -0400 Received: from smtp01.web.de ( [172.20.0.243]) by fmmailgate02.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B22216188BBC; Thu, 20 May 2010 19:49:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [80.128.73.13] (helo=[192.168.178.26]) by smtp01.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #4) id 1OF9sL-0002gv-00; Thu, 20 May 2010 19:49:41 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: X-Sender: Jens.Lehmann@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18FvvZGzcyxkvhr/pw2UDVfk4adzgwfWCU1fU57 llvkCQwgirPxXlqyv7jBSPXaYQH6eLCAlg5o9UNdyIvrhH5Lqc ujryq7352laAlrtGX/ng== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 20.05.2010 19:45, schrieb Andy Parkins: > (Most of my > personal use of submodule is embedding large projects that I want to be able > to guarantee are at a particular version, but I don't really change them) But to guarantee they are at a particular version they have to be checked for local modifications (no matter if they happened accidentally or on purpose), no?