From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthias Fechner Subject: Re: Migrate from svn to git Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:51:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4C04ADFC.9020309@fechner.net> References: <4BFD3AAF.4080403@fechner.net> Reply-To: git@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 01 08:53:21 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJLLh-0007HZ-5F for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:53:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753340Ab0FAGxM (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 02:53:12 -0400 Received: from anny.lostinspace.de ([80.190.182.2]:32309 "EHLO anny.lostinspace.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752864Ab0FAGxL (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 02:53:11 -0400 Received: from server.idefix.lan (ppp-88-217-57-122.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.57.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by anny.lostinspace.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o516r3Qm003575 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:53:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9E09A02 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:53:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.idefix.lan Received: from server.idefix.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by server.idefix.lan (server.idefix.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CSw7kArfK3Sb for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:52:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dhcp-10-27-1-64.internal.epo.org (unknown [192.168.20.6]) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AEC4699E8 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:52:56 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; de; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.5 (anny.lostinspace.de [80.190.182.2]); Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:53:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on anny.lostinspace.de Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi Michael, Am 31.05.10 14:01, schrieb Michael Witten: > Shouldn't the discussion happen before the commit? > in most of the cases it is not necessary, but the diff mails are used as an additional review step and sometimes additional changes follow. But it is a way to do it and people are used to do it. I'm thinking more and more about it and I think the best solution is to keep svn as the central repo and do a git svn clone from there, so I have the advantage of the existing infrastructure and will get the nice features from git. Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook