git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script
@ 2010-06-05 17:39 Mark Levedahl
  2010-06-05 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] git-gui " Mark Levedahl
  2010-06-06 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] commit.c " Jeff King
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Levedahl @ 2010-06-05 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git; +Cc: Mark Levedahl

If hooks/pre-commit acts based upon the changes to be checked in
rather than just the resulting content, the script needs to know which
commit to use. For a normal commit, this is HEAD, but when amending this
is HEAD~1. So, this modifies commit.c to pass $1 as normal|amend depending
upon the commit type. Existing scripts are unaffected as they did not
expect any argument so will silently ignore this extra bit of info.

Signed-off-by: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/githooks.txt         |    8 +++++---
 builtin/commit.c                   |    2 +-
 templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample |   10 ++++++++--
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/githooks.txt b/Documentation/githooks.txt
index 7183aa9..dbe1a1a 100644
--- a/Documentation/githooks.txt
+++ b/Documentation/githooks.txt
@@ -73,9 +73,11 @@ pre-commit
 ~~~~~~~~~~
 
 This hook is invoked by 'git commit', and can be bypassed
-with `\--no-verify` option.  It takes no parameter, and is
-invoked before obtaining the proposed commit log message and
-making a commit.  Exiting with non-zero status from this script
+with `\--no-verify` option.  It takes a single parameter indicating
+the commit type (normal|amend), and is invoked before obtaining the
+proposed commit log message and making a commit.  For $1=normal,
+the commit is against HEAD, while for $1=amend, the commit is
+against HEAD~1.  Exiting with non-zero status from this script
 causes the 'git commit' to abort.
 
 The default 'pre-commit' hook, when enabled, catches introduction
diff --git a/builtin/commit.c b/builtin/commit.c
index ddf77e4..8543f09 100644
--- a/builtin/commit.c
+++ b/builtin/commit.c
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static int prepare_to_commit(const char *index_file, const char *prefix,
 	const char *hook_arg2 = NULL;
 	int ident_shown = 0;
 
-	if (!no_verify && run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", NULL))
+	if (!no_verify && run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", amend ? "amend" : "normal", NULL))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (message.len) {
diff --git a/templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample b/templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample
index b187c4b..0c0c79f 100755
--- a/templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample
+++ b/templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 #!/bin/sh
 #
 # An example hook script to verify what is about to be committed.
-# Called by "git commit" with no arguments.  The hook should
+# Called by "git commit" with a single argument indicating the
+# commit-type (normal|amend). The hook should
 # exit with non-zero status after issuing an appropriate message if
 # it wants to stop the commit.
 #
@@ -9,7 +10,12 @@
 
 if git rev-parse --verify HEAD >/dev/null 2>&1
 then
-	against=HEAD
+	if test "$1" = "amend"
+	then
+		against=HEAD~1
+	else
+		against=HEAD
+	fi
 else
 	# Initial commit: diff against an empty tree object
 	against=4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904
-- 
1.7.1.270.g2a29a

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] git-gui - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script
  2010-06-05 17:39 [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script Mark Levedahl
@ 2010-06-05 17:43 ` Mark Levedahl
  2010-06-06 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] commit.c " Jeff King
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Levedahl @ 2010-06-05 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: spearce; +Cc: git, Mark Levedahl

If hooks/pre-commit acts based upon the changes to be checked in
rather than just the resulting content, the script needs to know which
commit to use. For a normal commit, this is HEAD, but when amending this
is HEAD~1. So, this modifies commit.c to pass $1 as normal|amend depending
upon the commit type. Existing scripts are unaffected as they did not
expect any argument so will silently ignore this extra bit of info.

Signed-off-by: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com>
---
 git-gui/lib/commit.tcl |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/git-gui/lib/commit.tcl b/git-gui/lib/commit.tcl
index 7f459cd..8150fa6 100644
--- a/git-gui/lib/commit.tcl
+++ b/git-gui/lib/commit.tcl
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ A good commit message has the following format:
 
 	# -- Run the pre-commit hook.
 	#
-	set fd_ph [githook_read pre-commit]
+	set fd_ph [githook_read pre-commit $commit_type]
 	if {$fd_ph eq {}} {
 		commit_commitmsg $curHEAD $msg_p
 		return
-- 
1.7.1.270.g2a29a

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script
  2010-06-05 17:39 [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script Mark Levedahl
  2010-06-05 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] git-gui " Mark Levedahl
@ 2010-06-06 22:10 ` Jeff King
  2010-06-07  0:21   ` Mark Levedahl
  2010-06-07  6:26   ` Johannes Sixt
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeff King @ 2010-06-06 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Levedahl; +Cc: git

On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 01:39:50PM -0400, Mark Levedahl wrote:

> -	if (!no_verify && run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", NULL))
> +	if (!no_verify && run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", amend ? "amend" : "normal", NULL))
> [...]
> -	against=HEAD
> +	if test "$1" = "amend"
> +	then
> +		against=HEAD~1
> +	else
> +		against=HEAD
> +	fi

Is there a reason to use the magic "amend" and "normal" words, if
scripts are just going to end up changing them back into HEAD~1 and HEAD
anyway?

-Peff

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script
  2010-06-06 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] commit.c " Jeff King
@ 2010-06-07  0:21   ` Mark Levedahl
  2010-06-07  6:26   ` Johannes Sixt
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Levedahl @ 2010-06-07  0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff King; +Cc: git

On 06/06/2010 06:10 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 01:39:50PM -0400, Mark Levedahl wrote:
>
>    
>> -	if (!no_verify&&  run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", NULL))
>> +	if (!no_verify&&  run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", amend ? "amend" : "normal", NULL))
>> [...]
>> -	against=HEAD
>> +	if test "$1" = "amend"
>> +	then
>> +		against=HEAD~1
>> +	else
>> +		against=HEAD
>> +	fi
>>      
> Is there a reason to use the magic "amend" and "normal" words, if
> scripts are just going to end up changing them back into HEAD~1 and HEAD
> anyway?
>
> -Peff
>
>    
Well, git-gui's internal $commit_type variable has the values 
normal|amend, so I went with those. So , yes there is a reason, but 
maybe not a great one :^). Given some consensus, this is trivial to 
change. I'll let things cook a while longer before sending a new patch.

Mark

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script
  2010-06-06 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] commit.c " Jeff King
  2010-06-07  0:21   ` Mark Levedahl
@ 2010-06-07  6:26   ` Johannes Sixt
  2010-06-07  6:38     ` Jeff King
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Sixt @ 2010-06-07  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff King; +Cc: Mark Levedahl, git

Am 6/7/2010 0:10, schrieb Jeff King:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 01:39:50PM -0400, Mark Levedahl wrote:
> 
>> -	if (!no_verify && run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", NULL))
>> +	if (!no_verify && run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", amend ? "amend" : "normal", NULL))
>> [...]
>> -	against=HEAD
>> +	if test "$1" = "amend"
>> +	then
>> +		against=HEAD~1
>> +	else
>> +		against=HEAD
>> +	fi
> 
> Is there a reason to use the magic "amend" and "normal" words, if
> scripts are just going to end up changing them back into HEAD~1 and HEAD
> anyway?

pre-commit might act differently when a commit is amended, the most likely
reason I can think of is to always allow to amend. When you have only a
SHA1, you can get that information only with an additional process.

-- Hannes

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script
  2010-06-07  6:26   ` Johannes Sixt
@ 2010-06-07  6:38     ` Jeff King
  2010-06-08  2:55       ` Mark Levedahl
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeff King @ 2010-06-07  6:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Johannes Sixt; +Cc: Mark Levedahl, git

On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 08:26:53AM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:

> > Is there a reason to use the magic "amend" and "normal" words, if
> > scripts are just going to end up changing them back into HEAD~1 and HEAD
> > anyway?
> 
> pre-commit might act differently when a commit is amended, the most likely
> reason I can think of is to always allow to amend. When you have only a
> SHA1, you can get that information only with an additional process.

Actually, I meant to provide the hook with the literal words "HEAD~1"
and "HEAD", not the sha1. So they are effectively magic words, but they
also happen to be useful for directly feeding to git commands.

It also extends naturally to indicating a merge commit ("HEAD" or
"HEAD~1" followed by some other ref). I don't know if that is useful or
not, but it seems like the same realm of information as whether or not
we are amending.

-Peff

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script
  2010-06-07  6:38     ` Jeff King
@ 2010-06-08  2:55       ` Mark Levedahl
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Levedahl @ 2010-06-08  2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff King; +Cc: Johannes Sixt, git

On 06/07/2010 02:38 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> Actually, I meant to provide the hook with the literal words "HEAD~1"
> and "HEAD", not the sha1. So they are effectively magic words, but they
> also happen to be useful for directly feeding to git commands.
>
> It also extends naturally to indicating a merge commit ("HEAD" or
> "HEAD~1" followed by some other ref). I don't know if that is useful or
> not, but it seems like the same realm of information as whether or not
> we are amending.
>
> -Peff
>
>    
I agree with this, though I have no itch regarding all of the commit 
parents for a merge commit so I'll leave that for another to scratch. 
So, I'm sending a new series to use HEAD~1 and HEAD rather than amend 
and normal.

Mark

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-08  2:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-05 17:39 [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script Mark Levedahl
2010-06-05 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] git-gui " Mark Levedahl
2010-06-06 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] commit.c " Jeff King
2010-06-07  0:21   ` Mark Levedahl
2010-06-07  6:26   ` Johannes Sixt
2010-06-07  6:38     ` Jeff King
2010-06-08  2:55       ` Mark Levedahl

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).