* [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script
@ 2010-06-05 17:39 Mark Levedahl
2010-06-05 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] git-gui " Mark Levedahl
2010-06-06 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] commit.c " Jeff King
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Levedahl @ 2010-06-05 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: Mark Levedahl
If hooks/pre-commit acts based upon the changes to be checked in
rather than just the resulting content, the script needs to know which
commit to use. For a normal commit, this is HEAD, but when amending this
is HEAD~1. So, this modifies commit.c to pass $1 as normal|amend depending
upon the commit type. Existing scripts are unaffected as they did not
expect any argument so will silently ignore this extra bit of info.
Signed-off-by: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/githooks.txt | 8 +++++---
builtin/commit.c | 2 +-
templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample | 10 ++++++++--
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/githooks.txt b/Documentation/githooks.txt
index 7183aa9..dbe1a1a 100644
--- a/Documentation/githooks.txt
+++ b/Documentation/githooks.txt
@@ -73,9 +73,11 @@ pre-commit
~~~~~~~~~~
This hook is invoked by 'git commit', and can be bypassed
-with `\--no-verify` option. It takes no parameter, and is
-invoked before obtaining the proposed commit log message and
-making a commit. Exiting with non-zero status from this script
+with `\--no-verify` option. It takes a single parameter indicating
+the commit type (normal|amend), and is invoked before obtaining the
+proposed commit log message and making a commit. For $1=normal,
+the commit is against HEAD, while for $1=amend, the commit is
+against HEAD~1. Exiting with non-zero status from this script
causes the 'git commit' to abort.
The default 'pre-commit' hook, when enabled, catches introduction
diff --git a/builtin/commit.c b/builtin/commit.c
index ddf77e4..8543f09 100644
--- a/builtin/commit.c
+++ b/builtin/commit.c
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static int prepare_to_commit(const char *index_file, const char *prefix,
const char *hook_arg2 = NULL;
int ident_shown = 0;
- if (!no_verify && run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", NULL))
+ if (!no_verify && run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", amend ? "amend" : "normal", NULL))
return 0;
if (message.len) {
diff --git a/templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample b/templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample
index b187c4b..0c0c79f 100755
--- a/templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample
+++ b/templates/hooks--pre-commit.sample
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
#!/bin/sh
#
# An example hook script to verify what is about to be committed.
-# Called by "git commit" with no arguments. The hook should
+# Called by "git commit" with a single argument indicating the
+# commit-type (normal|amend). The hook should
# exit with non-zero status after issuing an appropriate message if
# it wants to stop the commit.
#
@@ -9,7 +10,12 @@
if git rev-parse --verify HEAD >/dev/null 2>&1
then
- against=HEAD
+ if test "$1" = "amend"
+ then
+ against=HEAD~1
+ else
+ against=HEAD
+ fi
else
# Initial commit: diff against an empty tree object
against=4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904
--
1.7.1.270.g2a29a
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] git-gui - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script
2010-06-05 17:39 [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script Mark Levedahl
@ 2010-06-05 17:43 ` Mark Levedahl
2010-06-06 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] commit.c " Jeff King
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Levedahl @ 2010-06-05 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: spearce; +Cc: git, Mark Levedahl
If hooks/pre-commit acts based upon the changes to be checked in
rather than just the resulting content, the script needs to know which
commit to use. For a normal commit, this is HEAD, but when amending this
is HEAD~1. So, this modifies commit.c to pass $1 as normal|amend depending
upon the commit type. Existing scripts are unaffected as they did not
expect any argument so will silently ignore this extra bit of info.
Signed-off-by: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com>
---
git-gui/lib/commit.tcl | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-gui/lib/commit.tcl b/git-gui/lib/commit.tcl
index 7f459cd..8150fa6 100644
--- a/git-gui/lib/commit.tcl
+++ b/git-gui/lib/commit.tcl
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ A good commit message has the following format:
# -- Run the pre-commit hook.
#
- set fd_ph [githook_read pre-commit]
+ set fd_ph [githook_read pre-commit $commit_type]
if {$fd_ph eq {}} {
commit_commitmsg $curHEAD $msg_p
return
--
1.7.1.270.g2a29a
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script
2010-06-05 17:39 [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script Mark Levedahl
2010-06-05 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] git-gui " Mark Levedahl
@ 2010-06-06 22:10 ` Jeff King
2010-06-07 0:21 ` Mark Levedahl
2010-06-07 6:26 ` Johannes Sixt
1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeff King @ 2010-06-06 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Levedahl; +Cc: git
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 01:39:50PM -0400, Mark Levedahl wrote:
> - if (!no_verify && run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", NULL))
> + if (!no_verify && run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", amend ? "amend" : "normal", NULL))
> [...]
> - against=HEAD
> + if test "$1" = "amend"
> + then
> + against=HEAD~1
> + else
> + against=HEAD
> + fi
Is there a reason to use the magic "amend" and "normal" words, if
scripts are just going to end up changing them back into HEAD~1 and HEAD
anyway?
-Peff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script
2010-06-06 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] commit.c " Jeff King
@ 2010-06-07 0:21 ` Mark Levedahl
2010-06-07 6:26 ` Johannes Sixt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Levedahl @ 2010-06-07 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff King; +Cc: git
On 06/06/2010 06:10 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 01:39:50PM -0400, Mark Levedahl wrote:
>
>
>> - if (!no_verify&& run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", NULL))
>> + if (!no_verify&& run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", amend ? "amend" : "normal", NULL))
>> [...]
>> - against=HEAD
>> + if test "$1" = "amend"
>> + then
>> + against=HEAD~1
>> + else
>> + against=HEAD
>> + fi
>>
> Is there a reason to use the magic "amend" and "normal" words, if
> scripts are just going to end up changing them back into HEAD~1 and HEAD
> anyway?
>
> -Peff
>
>
Well, git-gui's internal $commit_type variable has the values
normal|amend, so I went with those. So , yes there is a reason, but
maybe not a great one :^). Given some consensus, this is trivial to
change. I'll let things cook a while longer before sending a new patch.
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script
2010-06-06 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] commit.c " Jeff King
2010-06-07 0:21 ` Mark Levedahl
@ 2010-06-07 6:26 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-06-07 6:38 ` Jeff King
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Sixt @ 2010-06-07 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff King; +Cc: Mark Levedahl, git
Am 6/7/2010 0:10, schrieb Jeff King:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 01:39:50PM -0400, Mark Levedahl wrote:
>
>> - if (!no_verify && run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", NULL))
>> + if (!no_verify && run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", amend ? "amend" : "normal", NULL))
>> [...]
>> - against=HEAD
>> + if test "$1" = "amend"
>> + then
>> + against=HEAD~1
>> + else
>> + against=HEAD
>> + fi
>
> Is there a reason to use the magic "amend" and "normal" words, if
> scripts are just going to end up changing them back into HEAD~1 and HEAD
> anyway?
pre-commit might act differently when a commit is amended, the most likely
reason I can think of is to always allow to amend. When you have only a
SHA1, you can get that information only with an additional process.
-- Hannes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script
2010-06-07 6:26 ` Johannes Sixt
@ 2010-06-07 6:38 ` Jeff King
2010-06-08 2:55 ` Mark Levedahl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeff King @ 2010-06-07 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Sixt; +Cc: Mark Levedahl, git
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 08:26:53AM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> > Is there a reason to use the magic "amend" and "normal" words, if
> > scripts are just going to end up changing them back into HEAD~1 and HEAD
> > anyway?
>
> pre-commit might act differently when a commit is amended, the most likely
> reason I can think of is to always allow to amend. When you have only a
> SHA1, you can get that information only with an additional process.
Actually, I meant to provide the hook with the literal words "HEAD~1"
and "HEAD", not the sha1. So they are effectively magic words, but they
also happen to be useful for directly feeding to git commands.
It also extends naturally to indicating a merge commit ("HEAD" or
"HEAD~1" followed by some other ref). I don't know if that is useful or
not, but it seems like the same realm of information as whether or not
we are amending.
-Peff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script
2010-06-07 6:38 ` Jeff King
@ 2010-06-08 2:55 ` Mark Levedahl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Levedahl @ 2010-06-08 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff King; +Cc: Johannes Sixt, git
On 06/07/2010 02:38 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> Actually, I meant to provide the hook with the literal words "HEAD~1"
> and "HEAD", not the sha1. So they are effectively magic words, but they
> also happen to be useful for directly feeding to git commands.
>
> It also extends naturally to indicating a merge commit ("HEAD" or
> "HEAD~1" followed by some other ref). I don't know if that is useful or
> not, but it seems like the same realm of information as whether or not
> we are amending.
>
> -Peff
>
>
I agree with this, though I have no itch regarding all of the commit
parents for a merge commit so I'll leave that for another to scratch.
So, I'm sending a new series to use HEAD~1 and HEAD rather than amend
and normal.
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-08 2:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-05 17:39 [PATCH 1/2] commit.c - provide commit-type to the hooks/pre-commit script Mark Levedahl
2010-06-05 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] git-gui " Mark Levedahl
2010-06-06 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] commit.c " Jeff King
2010-06-07 0:21 ` Mark Levedahl
2010-06-07 6:26 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-06-07 6:38 ` Jeff King
2010-06-08 2:55 ` Mark Levedahl
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).