From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Lehmann Subject: Re: [WIP PATCH 0/3] implement merge strategy for submodule links Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:54:48 +0200 Message-ID: <4C1CE848.5020602@web.de> References: <201006170239.01951.johan@herland.net> <4C1A8FDC.7010309@web.de> <201006181140.16652.johan@herland.net> <4C1B7ABE.8080905@web.de> <20100619094301.GA2667@book.hvoigt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johan Herland , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Heiko Voigt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 19 17:55:02 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQ0Nm-00080Q-3F for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:54:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756347Ab0FSPyx (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:54:53 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:59552 "EHLO fmmailgate01.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756249Ab0FSPyw (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:54:52 -0400 Received: from smtp04.web.de ( [172.20.0.225]) by fmmailgate01.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABA316079A4A; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:54:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [80.128.109.62] (helo=[192.168.178.26]) by smtp04.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #4) id 1OQ0Nf-000730-00; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:54:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <20100619094301.GA2667@book.hvoigt.net> X-Sender: Jens.Lehmann@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+ufW1tT/lBxi/763q02iIGUjFMEiaWtcdpXOBZ sCeAllRS8kBiEhWYe8W3wEnr8TprudBXhQb7mxQjULe/epcorL Uhxr9/wNEs4FVREEWKIA== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 19.06.2010 11:43, schrieb Heiko Voigt: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:55:10PM +0200, Jens Lehmann wrote: >> Nice summary. Heiko, would you please post a new patch implementing this >> approach? > > Yes sure. I agree with the proposed scheme. Thank you very much! > As Jens is working on the automatically checkout submodules extension I > will base the merge patch on your branch. Is the checkout_submodule() > function already stable enough to be used? Unfortunately not (the checkout itself is working fine, but the test if the checkout would overwrite local changes in the submodules is still missing, so be warned!).