git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Eyvind Bernhardsen <eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Finn Arne Gangstad <finnag@pvv.org>,
	"git@vger.kernel.org List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] Don't expand CRLFs when normalizing text during merge
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:17:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C246622.9090707@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FB02F1B0-9FE7-4B7B-BA30-5A510F83BCE7@gmail.com>

Am 6/25/2010 9:58, schrieb Eyvind Bernhardsen:
> On 25. juni 2010, at 07.45, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> 
>> Am 6/24/2010 22:44, schrieb Eyvind Bernhardsen:
>>> There's no need to expand CRLFs when convert_to_working_tree() is called
>>> to normalize text for a merge since the text will be converted back
>>> immediately.  Improves performance of merges with conflicting line
>>> endings when core.eol=crlf or core.autocrlf=true.
>>
>> Pardon me, first you make a big deal about normalization for merges, only
>> that you finally omit it? What am I missing?
> 
> Sorry, I didn't explain that very well.  I noticed that normalize_buffer()
> does more work when core.eol=crlf than it does when core.eol=lf:
> _to_working_tree() converts LF to CRLF, and then _to_git() reverses that
> conversion.  This patch makes normalization act the same way when
> core.eol=crlf as it does when core.eol=lf.

Got it: I missed that you are omitting the conversion only on the "way
out" but not on the "way back".

Looking more closely at your patch, I think that you should make this
optimization only if you can prove that the subsequent apply_filter() is a
no-op. Otherwise, you may break a smudge filter that expects CRLFs.

-- Hannes

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-25  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-24 20:44 [PATCH v3 0/3] Help merging when text has been normalized Eyvind Bernhardsen
2010-06-24 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] Avoid conflicts when merging branches with mixed normalization Eyvind Bernhardsen
2010-06-24 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] Try normalizing files to avoid delete/modify conflicts when merging Eyvind Bernhardsen
2010-06-24 20:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] Don't expand CRLFs when normalizing text during merge Eyvind Bernhardsen
2010-06-25  5:45   ` Johannes Sixt
2010-06-25  7:58     ` Eyvind Bernhardsen
2010-06-25  8:17       ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2010-06-25  8:58         ` Eyvind Bernhardsen
2010-06-25  8:00     ` Finn Arne Gangstad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C246622.9090707@viscovery.net \
    --to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
    --cc=eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com \
    --cc=finnag@pvv.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).