From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Lehmann Subject: Re: Avery Pennarun's git-subtree? Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:10:59 +0200 Message-ID: <4C49B103.2010002@web.de> References: <4C472B48.8050101@gmail.com> <4C4778DE.9090905@web.de> <20100722195653.GC4439@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C6var_Arnfj=F6r=F0_Bjarmason?= , Jonathan Nieder , Jakub Narebski , Bryan Larsen , git , Junio C Hamano , Linus Torvalds To: Avery Pennarun X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 23 17:11:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OcJuK-00028d-6o for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:11:28 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760356Ab0GWPLE convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:11:04 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:51030 "EHLO fmmailgate01.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760275Ab0GWPLD (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:11:03 -0400 Received: from smtp07.web.de ( [172.20.5.215]) by fmmailgate01.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C2B164CF909; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:10:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [80.128.110.50] (helo=[192.168.178.29]) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #4) id 1OcJtr-0001Rl-00; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:10:59 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1 In-Reply-To: X-Sender: Jens.Lehmann@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18ej4ACSLUzZeM3f8nnSMBcxuvElqf4f7un1Sr0 TpdFCmzKP6Ss5eYcQ+8Qx0MMYYHp2ppxsLD1RE9NAOUW6YWfZ4 PNaz8iBQ2W8F0MLun7Ig== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 22.07.2010 23:33, schrieb Avery Pennarun: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:17 PM, =C6var Arnfj=F6r=F0 Bjarmason > wrote: >> But it's also clear that we have a lot of tribal knowledge about the >> lackings of git submodule / git subtree. It would be *really* useful >> if people like Avery and Jens which have obviously thought hard abou= t >> the submodule/subtree issues would draft up some (calmly written) do= cs >> about how the two differ (with comparison tables etc.). >> >> That'd be a very helpful resource for Git users in deciding which on= e >> to use. >=20 > I think I'm too biased to write that, but if someone else wants to > take the lead, I could certainly contribute. While I don't consider myself biased, I just don't know enough about the details of the subtree approach to write that. But I would certainly contribute to the submodule side of such a document too.