From: "Tor Arne Vestbø" <tor.arne.vestbo@nokia.com>
To: ext Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, trast@student.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH] require_work_tree: Look for top-level instead of is-inside-work-tree
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:04:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C52B1BE.8020804@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v4ofjw6t6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hey, and thanks for your feedback Junio!
On 29.07.10 01.00, ext Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@nokia.com> writes:
>
> > The documentation describes require_work_tree as guarding against
> > bare repositories, and that's also the way it's used from porcelain
> > such as git-rebase. When implemented using --is-inside-work-tree
> > the samantics change, causing git-rebase to fail if run from outside
> > GIT_WORK_TREE, even if GIT_WORK_TREE is valid.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <tor.arne.vestbo@nokia.com>
> > ---
>
> The "requirement" is that we _have_ work tree somewhere that we can
> cd-to-toplevel to if we wanted to, not that we _are_ already in the work
> tree. I can buy that rationale.
Right. You put it much nicer than me :)
> However, I notice that "git bisect", "git mergetool" and "git submodule"
> do not seem to do cd_to_topleve immediately after require_work_tree. The
> last one has cd_to_toplevel in later parts of the codepath, presumably so
> that it can collect paths relative to the subdirectory in the work tree.
> I wonder if all of them actually need to be run from inside a work tree?
> Don't they need a separate "git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree || die"
> check after require_work_tree (or perhaps cd_to_toplevel) if we apply this
> patch?
I think if we have a work tree somewhere, we can at least do "git
rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree || cd_to_toplevel" instead of dying,
unless there's some danger to that (the user running a command from
outside GIT_WORK_TREE but expecting GIT_WORK_TREE to not be touched).
For "git bisect" and "git submodule" running them in a sub-directory of
the work tree complains about needing to be run from the top-level, so I
assume we can do an unconditional cd_to_toplevel after the
require_work_tree?
For "git mergetool" we should probably do it conditionally only if the
user is not inside a work tree already, so that the behavior of running
the tool in a sub-directory is not changed.
Tor Arne
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-30 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-28 16:47 [PATCH] require_work_tree: Look for top-level instead of is-inside-work-tree Tor Arne Vestbø
2010-07-28 23:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-07-30 11:04 ` Tor Arne Vestbø [this message]
2010-08-02 14:37 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-08-02 17:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-08-03 7:57 ` Michael J Gruber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C52B1BE.8020804@nokia.com \
--to=tor.arne.vestbo@nokia.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=trast@student.ethz.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).