From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomas Carnecky Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Introduce git-hive Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:08:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4C83F8CE.2060403@dbservice.com> References: <1283198367-11440-1-git-send-email-cdahlin@redhat.com> <20100831143839.GC16034@foucault.redhat.com> <20100831155159.GD16034@foucault.redhat.com> <815C806E-E7DC-4B7D-9B45-4C9B289DFEEF@sb.org> <20100831191909.GF16034@foucault.redhat.com> <9CA6AC3D-5C51-4770-BF78-077DE5CD80C5@sb.org> <20100831192539.GG16034@foucault.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kevin Ballard , Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton , Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , git To: Casey Dahlin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Sep 05 22:09:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsLWd-0005BZ-Ly for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:09:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754489Ab0IEUJJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Sep 2010 16:09:09 -0400 Received: from office.neopsis.com ([78.46.209.98]:41307 "EHLO office.neopsis.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754459Ab0IEUJI (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Sep 2010 16:09:08 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL: 0.061,BAYES_00: -1.665,TOTAL_SCORE: -1.604,autolearn=ham X-Spam-Level: Received: from calvin.caurea.org ([62.65.141.13]) (authenticated user tom@dbservice.com) by office.neopsis.com (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)); Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:08:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 In-Reply-To: <20100831192539.GG16034@foucault.redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 8/31/10 9:25 PM, Casey Dahlin wrote: > Not sure Avahi will be used at all at this point given present objections. Its Which objections? > hard because although its the same protocol, I believe the api is different, so > we'd need additional code. I don't think bundling Avahi on OSX is the right > answer to anything regardless. You can code against the mDNSResponder API and on Linux use the Avahi mDNSResponder compatibility layer. tom