From: Kent Borg <kentborg@borg.org>
To: Tor Arvid Lund <torarvid@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Alejandro Riveira Fernández" <ariveira@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: git-p4
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:30:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C8CF231.6090403@borg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinmG5BU+yswWQ8=cRKT5WL_h8vWuUCu2PjZYb87@mail.gmail.com>
Tor Arvid Lund wrote:
> [git-p4: depot-paths = "//Path/To/Your/Project/": change = 30049]
> .. where the 'change' number is the number of the perforce changelist
> you synced using git-p4.
>
> So - work that you want to submit to p4 should be rebased on top of
> such a commit. Then it should work to do git-p4 submit.
>
That doesn't work. I am suspecting there is a tangle in my branches.
Firing up a Python session and manually running the git-p4
findUpstreamBranchPoint() I get back something reminiscent of the commit
I made at your suggestion:
['remotes/p4/master', {'change': '160991', 'depot-paths':
['//depot/imgeng/sw/inferno/kernel/linux-2.6.33-quatro']}]
I thought it looked reasonable, but when I try to run the git p4 summit,
at line 811 in git-p4 it is doing:
git rev-list --no-merges remotes/p4/master..master
And then reversing the results and trying to apply them all, starting
with 1da177e (which is Linux-2.16.12-rc), and again it fails. (Again,
thank goodness it failed at that.) How is git rev-list supposed to get
a limited list back?
Anyone spot my silliness? Next I'm going to see if I can create a
normal (and working) case for comparison. (As a newbie git is one
thing, trying to understand git-p4 at the same time makes it that much
harder.)
Thanks a bunch,
-kb, the Kent who Monday morning (UTC-0400) would love to casually say
"Oh, yes, git-p4 is working great, both directions, no problem.".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-12 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4C8A8CE8.90600@borg.org>
2010-09-10 21:53 ` git-p4 Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2010-09-11 18:42 ` git-p4 Tor Arvid Lund
2010-09-12 15:30 ` Kent Borg [this message]
2010-09-12 17:22 ` git-p4 Tor Arvid Lund
2010-09-12 17:59 ` git-p4 Kent Borg
2010-09-12 19:54 ` git-p4 Tor Arvid Lund
2010-09-12 20:07 ` git-p4 Kent Borg
2010-09-12 20:12 ` git-p4 Tor Arvid Lund
2010-09-13 14:23 ` git-p4 Kent Borg
2010-09-13 15:01 ` git-p4 Tor Arvid Lund
2010-09-13 16:28 ` git-p4 Kent Borg
2010-09-13 21:58 ` git-p4 Tor Arvid Lund
2010-09-16 12:14 ` git-p4 Kent Borg
2010-09-16 13:54 ` git-p4 Tor Arvid Lund
2008-09-07 13:17 git-p4 dhruva
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-07 13:17 git-p4 dhruva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C8CF231.6090403@borg.org \
--to=kentborg@borg.org \
--cc=ariveira@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torarvid@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).