From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Schalk, Ken" <ken.schalk@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/37] t3030: Add a testcase for resolvable rename/add conflict with symlinks
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:15:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C97262A.9030501@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284971350-30590-2-git-send-email-newren@gmail.com>
Am 9/20/2010 10:28, schrieb Elijah Newren:
> @@ -255,7 +259,16 @@ test_expect_success 'setup 8' '
> git mv a e &&
> git add e &&
> test_tick &&
> - git commit -m "rename a->e"
> + git commit -m "rename a->e" &&
> + if test_have_prereq SYMLINKS
> + then
> + git checkout rename-ln &&
> + git mv a e &&
> + ln -s e a &&
> + git add a e &&
> + test_tick &&
> + git commit -m "rename a->e, symlink a->e"
> + fi
> '
You don't need the SYMLINKS prerequisite anywhere. Write this without ln -s:
git commit -m "rename a->e" &&
git checkout rename-ln &&
git mv a e &&
sha1e=$(printf e | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
git update-index --add --cacheinfo 120000 $sha1e a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "rename a->e, symlink a->e"
and the new test case passes even when SYMLINKS are not available!
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-20 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-20 8:28 [PATCH 00/37] Audit and fix corner case bugs in recursive merge Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 01/37] t3030: Add a testcase for resolvable rename/add conflict with symlinks Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 9:15 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2010-09-20 9:34 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 02/37] merge-recursive: Restructure showing how to chain more process_* functions Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 03/37] t6032: Add a test checking for excessive output from merge Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 04/37] t6022: Add test combinations of {content conflict?, D/F conflict remains?} Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 05/37] t6022: Add tests for reversing order of merges when D/F conflicts present Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 06/37] t6022: Add tests with both rename source & dest involved in D/F conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 07/37] t6022: Add paired rename+D/F conflict: (two/file, one/file) -> (one, two) Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 08/37] t6022: Add tests for rename/rename combined with D/F conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 09/37] t6020: Modernize style a bit Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 9:24 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-09-20 16:03 ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-22 1:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-09-22 4:41 ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 10/37] t6020: Add a testcase for modify/delete + directory/file conflict Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 11/37] t6036: Test index and worktree state, not just that merge fails Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 12/37] t6036: Add a second testcase similar to the first but with content changes Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 13/37] t6036: Add testcase for undetected conflict Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 14/37] merge-recursive: Small code clarification -- variable name and comments Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 15/37] merge-recursive: Rename conflict_rename_rename*() for clarity Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 16/37] merge-recursive: Nuke rename/directory conflict detection Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 17/37] merge-recursive: Move rename/delete handling into dedicated function Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 18/37] merge-recursive: Move delete/modify " Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 19/37] merge-recursive: Move process_entry's content merging into a function Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 20/37] merge-recursive: New data structures for deferring of D/F conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 21/37] merge-recursive: New function to assist resolving renames in-core only Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 22/37] merge-recursive: Have process_entry() skip D/F or rename entries Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 23/37] merge-recursive: Structure process_df_entry() to handle more cases Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 24/37] merge-recursive: Update conflict_rename_rename_1to2() call signature Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 25/37] merge-recursive: Update merge_content() " Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:28 ` [PATCH 26/37] merge-recursive: Avoid doubly merging rename/add conflict contents Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 27/37] merge-recursive: Move handling of double rename of one file to two Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 28/37] merge-recursive: Move handling of double rename of one file to other file Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 29/37] merge-recursive: Delay handling of rename/delete conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 30/37] merge-recursive: Delay content merging for renames Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 31/37] merge-recursive: Delay modify/delete conflicts if D/F conflict present Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 32/37] conflict_rename_delete(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still present Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 33/37] conflict_rename_rename_1to2(): Fix checks for presence of D/F conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 34/37] merge_content(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still present Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 35/37] handle_delete_modify(): " Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 36/37] merge-recursive: Make room for directories in D/F conflicts Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 11:40 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-09-20 16:06 ` Elijah Newren
2010-09-20 8:29 ` [PATCH 37/37] merge-recursive: Remove redundant path clearing for " Elijah Newren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C97262A.9030501@viscovery.net \
--to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ken.schalk@intel.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).