From: Artur Skawina <art.08.09@gmail.com>
To: Seth Robertson <in-gitvger@baka.org>
Cc: Stefan Haller <lists@haller-berlin.de>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Find out on which branch a commit was originally made
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 04:12:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C981475.10404@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009210015.o8L0FcJt020691@no.baka.org>
On 09/21/10 02:15, Seth Robertson wrote:
>
> I've discovered an error case in your pike script's logic (as and if I
> understand it). If there are multiple children of the commit in
> question and those two children both merge onto the target branch, the
> path your program prints is incorrect (specifically, for reference B
> it prints D and then G--the correct answer is G only or a least D+H).
> It does not check to see whether a specific reachable merge commit is
> reachable by the path you have started to print.
>
> ----master-----------G------H
> / /
> | /
> --A-------D-----------F-
> / |
> ----B---C |
> \ |
> ----------E--/
I haven't checked, but I expect it to print exactly 'D' and 'G'.
'H' isn't interesting, as both parents already contain 'B'.
Yes, 'D' could be omitted, but knowing where else 'B' also
appeared /can/ be useful (and figuring out if it's safe to skip
'D' would be more expensive).
> Unpikifying is left as an exercise for the user. ;)
>
> I've converted it to perl and it now handles both your problem (which
I wasn't exactly thinking of perl when i wrote that... :)
> Of course it still suffers from reporting branches created after the
> reference you are interested in was created.
Well, at least git-find-branch-for, shows (some) merges _to_ other
(topic/remote) branches, but after browsing the kernel history
for a while i'm a bit surprised -- this causes significantly less
problems than i expected.
I haven't looked at your script, so i'm not sure what exactly it
tries to do, but i ran a quick test, using the kernel tree:
$ time git-find-branch-for 1f9c381fa3e0b9b9042e310c69df87eaf9b46ea4
84e48b6d64fd Merge of master.kernel.org:/home/rmk/linux-2.6-rmk.git 050503 22:27
bfd4bda097f8 Merge with master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/t 050505 12:59
325a479c4c11 Merge with temp tree to get David's gdb inferior calls p 050517 22:53
ad34ea2cc384 merge by hand - fix up rejections in Documentation/DocBo 050520 20:27
0m10.549s user 0m0.713s system 0m10.963s elapsed 102.74% CPU
$
$ time git-what-branch 1f9c381fa3e0b9b9042e310c69df87eaf9b46ea4
1f9c381fa3e0b9b9042e310c69df87eaf9b46ea4 first merged onto v2.6.32.n using the following minimal path:
v2.6.12-rc3-450-g1f9c381 merged up at v2.6.12-rc4-39-gad34ea2 (Fri May 20 22:27:44 2005)
v2.6.12-rc4-39-gad34ea2 merged up at v2.6.12-rc3-590-gbfd4bda (Thu May 5 14:59:37 2005)
v2.6.12-rc3-590-gbfd4bda merged up at v2.6.12-rc3-461-g84e48b6 (Wed May 4 00:27:24 2005)
v2.6.12-rc3-461-g84e48b6 is on v2.6.32.n
18m29.771s user 0m29.681s system 18m4.897s elapsed 105.03% CPU
$
Results are similar, that one extra merge i'll have to take a look at
later, but the cost difference...
artur
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-21 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-18 9:19 Find out on which branch a commit was originally made Stefan Haller
2010-09-18 9:58 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-09-18 10:02 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-09-18 11:28 ` Tor Arntsen
2010-09-18 15:26 ` Stefan Haller
2010-09-18 16:41 ` Artur Skawina
2010-09-19 9:45 ` Stefan Haller
2010-09-19 12:54 ` Clemens Buchacher
2010-09-19 14:03 ` Artur Skawina
2010-09-19 14:08 ` Stefan Haller
2010-09-19 16:38 ` Artur Skawina
2010-09-19 18:30 ` Robin Rosenberg
2010-09-19 22:03 ` Seth Robertson
2010-09-19 23:12 ` Artur Skawina
2010-09-19 23:54 ` Seth Robertson
2010-09-20 1:31 ` Artur Skawina
2010-09-20 5:47 ` Seth Robertson
2010-09-20 8:12 ` Stefan Haller
2010-09-20 10:58 ` Artur Skawina
2010-09-20 15:49 ` Artur Skawina
2010-09-21 0:15 ` Seth Robertson
2010-09-21 2:12 ` Artur Skawina [this message]
2010-09-22 16:35 ` ANNOUNCE git-what-branch (was Re: Find out on which branch a commit was originally made) Seth Robertson
2010-09-22 20:27 ` Artur Skawina
2010-09-22 23:26 ` Find out on which branch a commit was originally made) (was ANNOUNCE git-what-branch) Seth Robertson
2010-09-23 13:14 ` Stephen Bash
2010-09-23 13:26 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-09-23 21:32 ` Artur Skawina
2010-09-24 1:33 ` Artur Skawina
2010-09-24 20:57 ` Seth Robertson
2010-09-23 14:27 ` Seth Robertson
2010-09-20 18:20 ` Find out on which branch a commit was originally made Stefan Haller
2010-09-24 18:26 ` Bryan Drewery
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C981475.10404@gmail.com \
--to=art.08.09@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=in-gitvger@baka.org \
--cc=lists@haller-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).