git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
To: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Teach fetch and pull to recursively fetch submodules too
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 21:17:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CB0BFDB.7010503@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FB03A7DB-67D2-4EAE-A0F0-2F3E3CEA9878@sb.org>

Am 07.10.2010 00:52, schrieb Kevin Ballard:
> On Oct 5, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> I dunno.  I've never been a fan of automatically recursing into submodules
>> (iow, treating the nested structure as if there is no nesting), so...
> 
> I agree with this as well.

There are use cases like mine where automatic recursion is just the right
thing to do. But I would be fine with having to turn the recursion on
explicitly in the configuration if most people think recursion is not a
desirable default. It would be really nice to hear from other submodule
users what they think about that ...


> After thinking on it a bit, I think the best solution is to add a switch
> --submodules to fetch which will also fetch all submodules, but otherwise
> fetch will fetch no submodules. This will avoid the problem of detecting
> changed submodules, while still allowing users to explicitly request all
> submodules in case they're about to get on a plane flight.
> And of course we can use a config switch to turn --submodules on or off
> by default.

And apart from the default setting and the name of the option this is
exactly what this patch series does, or am I missing something? I could
rename the option from '--recursive' to '--submodules' if that is
requested (I chose the former for consistency reasons as it is already
used by "git clone" for the same purpose; and IMO we should then use
the same option name for recursive checkout and grep too).


> We should also give some thought to automatically updating submodules
> when `git pull` is performed. I could imagine `git pull --submodules`
> effectively doing `git pull && git submodule update --init --recursive`,
> though this implies submodule updating behavior as part of merge, and
> it seems harder to justify that.

This is the goal of my recursive checkout effort ("update" being the
easier part, "--init" the harder). And if you have recursive checkout
enabled, I think it is justified to update the submodules as part of
the merge.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-10-09 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-29 15:49 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Teach fetch and pull to recursively fetch submodules too Jens Lehmann
2010-08-29 15:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] fetch/pull: Recursively fetch populated submodules Jens Lehmann
2010-08-29 15:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] Submodules: Add the new "fetch" config option Jens Lehmann
2010-08-30  7:34   ` Junio C Hamano
2010-08-30 17:37     ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] Submodules: Add the new "fetch" config option for fetch and pull Jens Lehmann
2010-08-29 17:29 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Teach fetch and pull to recursively fetch submodules too Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-08-29 22:34   ` Jens Lehmann
2010-08-30  5:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-08-30 17:41   ` Jens Lehmann
2010-09-15  0:18   ` Kevin Ballard
2010-09-15  2:40     ` Kevin Ballard
2010-09-16 13:55       ` [PATCH] fetch: Get submodule paths from index and not from .gitmodules Jens Lehmann
2010-09-16 19:29         ` Kevin Ballard
2010-09-17 11:31           ` Jens Lehmann
2010-09-17 12:06             ` Johannes Sixt
2010-09-17 12:22               ` Jens Lehmann
2010-09-17 12:32                 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-09-17 14:01                   ` Jens Lehmann
2010-09-17 14:14                     ` Johannes Sixt
2010-09-18  0:29                 ` Kevin Ballard
2010-09-18 22:32                   ` [PATCH 0/2] fix problems with recursive submodule fetching Jens Lehmann
2010-09-18 22:33                     ` [PATCH 1/2] fetch: Fix a bug swallowing the output of " Jens Lehmann
2010-09-18 22:35                     ` [PATCH 2/2] fetch: Get submodule paths from index and not from .gitmodules Jens Lehmann
2010-09-19  3:54                     ` [PATCH 0/2] fix problems with recursive submodule fetching Kevin Ballard
2010-09-19 16:40                       ` Jens Lehmann
2010-09-20  6:40                         ` Kevin Ballard
2010-10-05 20:43                           ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Teach fetch and pull to recursively fetch submodules too Jens Lehmann
2010-10-05 20:43                             ` [PATCH 1/3] fetch/pull: Recursively fetch populated submodules Jens Lehmann
2010-10-05 20:44                             ` [PATCH 2/3] Submodules: Add the new "fetch" config option for fetch and pull Jens Lehmann
2010-10-07 13:33                               ` Jon Seymour
2010-10-09 19:22                                 ` Jens Lehmann
2010-10-09 19:54                                   ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-09 20:12                                     ` Jens Lehmann
2010-10-05 20:45                             ` [PATCH 3/3] Add the 'fetch.recursive' config setting Jens Lehmann
2010-10-05 21:06                             ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Teach fetch and pull to recursively fetch submodules too Junio C Hamano
2010-10-06 22:52                             ` Kevin Ballard
2010-10-06 23:22                               ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-09 19:28                                 ` Jens Lehmann
2010-10-09 20:02                                   ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-09 20:37                                     ` Jens Lehmann
2010-10-21 18:29                                       ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-21 21:15                                         ` Jens Lehmann
2010-10-09 19:17                               ` Jens Lehmann [this message]
2010-10-13 14:48                                 ` Marc Branchaud
2010-10-13 19:32                                   ` Jens Lehmann
2010-10-13 19:34                                     ` Kevin Ballard
2010-10-13 20:06                                       ` Jens Lehmann
2010-10-13 20:11                                         ` Kevin Ballard
2010-10-14  1:01                                         ` Chris Packham
2010-10-14 18:14                                           ` Jens Lehmann
2010-10-14 18:31                                             ` Chris Packham
2010-10-13 21:27                                       ` Marc Branchaud
2010-10-13 21:31                                         ` Kevin Ballard
2010-09-15 11:32     ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] " Jens Lehmann
2010-09-15 23:12       ` Kevin Ballard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CB0BFDB.7010503@web.de \
    --to=jens.lehmann@web.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=kevin@sb.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).