git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua Jensen <jjensen@workspacewhiz.com>
To: Eric Raible <raible@nextest.com>
Cc: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
	Euguess@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why the default action for pull is merge, but not rebase?
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:53:41 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC8E5B5.7050404@workspacewhiz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC87DE6.9090604@nextest.com>

----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Raible
Date: 10/27/2010 1:30 PM
> One frustrating aspect of branch.<name>.rebase is that AFAIK
> there's no way for it to preserve merges.
>
> I would much prefer if branch.<name>.rebase was allowed to
> specify the arguments to be passed to rebase:
>
> 	git config branch.mybranch.rebase "-i --preserve-merges"
>
> Anyone else see the value of something like this?
When --preserve-merges actually preserves the merges (perhaps the 
rebase-i-p branch is on the way to finishing this feature??  I couldn't 
get it to apply...), I would like this facility very much.  By default, 
I think rebase *should* preserve merges, and the current flattening it 
does now should be an option.

Josh

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-28  2:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-27 16:46 Why the default action for pull is merge, but not rebase? Eugene Sajine
2010-10-27 16:57 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-27 17:21   ` Eugene Sajine
2010-10-27 17:36     ` Jonathan Nieder
     [not found]       ` <0016e645b8c87a160804939cdc5e@google.com>
2010-10-27 17:58         ` Eugene Sajine
2010-10-27 18:05         ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-10-27 19:30           ` Eric Raible
2010-10-28  2:53             ` Joshua Jensen [this message]
2010-10-28  3:27               ` Kevin Ballard
2010-10-28  6:39                 ` Eric Raible
2010-10-28  7:13                   ` Kevin Ballard
2010-10-28  7:27             ` Stefan Haller
2010-10-28  6:17     ` Björn Steinbrink

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CC8E5B5.7050404@workspacewhiz.com \
    --to=jjensen@workspacewhiz.com \
    --cc=Euguess@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=raible@nextest.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).