From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Lehmann Subject: Re: .git as file pointing to directory? Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:35:16 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD31904.5040308@web.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Brad Larson , git@vger.kernel.org To: Matthieu Moy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 04 21:35:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PE6X7-0004jh-HP for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:35:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752880Ab0KDUfV (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:35:21 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:55083 "EHLO fmmailgate02.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752807Ab0KDUfS (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:35:18 -0400 Received: from smtp05.web.de ( [172.20.4.166]) by fmmailgate02.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601AF17DE655F; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:35:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from [93.246.52.145] (helo=[192.168.178.29]) by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #24) id 1PE6Wj-00030S-00; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:35:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: X-Sender: Jens.Lehmann@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19m4+lFPM2L31pnLmHNPmALG+aRXThiCMBfJxmq dWP+xkvb7Qp6xTW+OfBEyWXrP3sGxwfWa8RwmF+/4R+jhIOYIf HJoONBrl+0hDhOnmVwyQ== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 04.11.2010 19:32, schrieb Matthieu Moy: > Brad Larson writes: > >> Sorry if this is obvious, I can't figure out what term to search for. >> >> At gittogether there was some talk about having .git be a file, not a >> folder, with contents pointing to the real .git directory. Similar to >> a symlink, but supported in Windows. Is there a specific name for >> this feature? Where can I find more details? Which version of git >> introduced this? > > It has been discussed under the name "gitlink", which was > unfortunately also used for something else in the subtree > implementation, but AFAIK, it has never been implemented. Hmm, AFAIK gitlinks are already in heavy use for submodule entries ...