From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Lehmann Subject: Re: .git as file pointing to directory? Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:28:20 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD34194.8010002@web.de> References: <4CD31904.5040308@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Brad Larson , git@vger.kernel.org To: Matthieu Moy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 05 00:28:30 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PE9EJ-0006NS-Tm for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:28:28 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751318Ab0KDX2X (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:28:23 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:51613 "EHLO fmmailgate02.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750983Ab0KDX2W (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:28:22 -0400 Received: from smtp04.web.de ( [172.20.0.225]) by fmmailgate02.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D397517DDAEBF; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 00:28:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from [93.240.104.42] (helo=[192.168.178.29]) by smtp04.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #24) id 1PE9EC-0005f0-00; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:28:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: X-Sender: Jens.Lehmann@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+x1Y4OtZ8A+oflEgbIffD2nfn0wolKuG6OEaRf W3K2X1EiFTA9InnzbBHWmObGde+j5i2DkJBekzWLTBkyVQhc0U 17OL7+3fRTXq+sVf9qkw== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 04.11.2010 23:14, schrieb Matthieu Moy: > Jens Lehmann writes: > >> Am 04.11.2010 19:32, schrieb Matthieu Moy: >>> Brad Larson writes: >>> >>>> Sorry if this is obvious, I can't figure out what term to search for. >>>> >>>> At gittogether there was some talk about having .git be a file, not a >>>> folder, with contents pointing to the real .git directory. Similar to >>>> a symlink, but supported in Windows. Is there a specific name for >>>> this feature? Where can I find more details? Which version of git >>>> introduced this? >>> >>> It has been discussed under the name "gitlink", which was >>> unfortunately also used for something else in the subtree >>> implementation, but AFAIK, it has never been implemented. >> >> Hmm, AFAIK gitlinks are already in heavy use for submodule entries ... > > Err, isn't that precisely what I was saying? The same word has been > used in the subtree implementation, but the other concept with the > same name hasn't been implemented. Sorry, seems like I misunderstood what you where saying.