From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/5] gettext: fix bug in git-sh-i18n's eval_gettext() by using envsubst(1) Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:53:29 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD94449.1040201@viscovery.net> References: <1288524860-538-2-git-send-email-avarab@gmail.com> <4CCFCCC8.7080603@viscovery.net> <4CD8F965.6050402@viscovery.net> <4CD918AB.6060206@viscovery.net> <4CD9241F.6070807@viscovery.net> <4CD933BF.6070105@viscovery.net> <4CD93CF2.2060800@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Nieder , Junio C Hamano To: =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 09 13:53:58 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PFni2-0006cz-Jq for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:53:58 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751032Ab0KIMxe convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:53:34 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:2460 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1749667Ab0KIMxe convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:53:34 -0500 Received: from cpe228-254.liwest.at ([81.10.228.254] helo=theia.linz.viscovery) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PFnhZ-000534-Id; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:53:29 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.95]) by theia.linz.viscovery (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FBC81660F; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:53:29 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 11/9/2010 13:38, schrieb =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason: > I understood your previous comments to mean that the invocation time > of git-* on one hand and cat(1) on the other hand had to do with how > many DLL's the former needed. I was only guessing; I can't explain the timing difference. > Since git-sh-i18n--envsubst needs the same DLL's (i.e. the libc) as > cat(1) and *nothing else* it should be as fast as cat(1) and not as > slow as git-*(1) once I fix that unfortunate Makefile bug, right? Wrong. Please accept it as a fact (and I'll forgive your ignorance ;) I would like to spend the time explaining the reasons only if you want to compile git on Windows yourself. -- Hannes