From: "René Scharfe" <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cmd_cherry in builtin/log.c?
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:14:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0146BA.2090801@lsrfire.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vaakhpbq2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Am 07.12.2010 21:30, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> writes:
>
>> Am 07.12.2010 18:39, schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
>>> while the core of the builtin version is
>>>
>>> get_patch_ids(&revs, &patch_id_opts, prefix);
>>>
>>> The latter function is static, introduced by v1.4.1~12^2~5
>>> (format-patch: introduce "--ignore-if-in-upstream", 2006-06-25).
>>>
>>> So the answer is that "git cherry" is considered a variant on
>>> "git log" (like format-patch, show, and whatchanged) and that it uses
>>> "git log" internals.
>>
>> That's right. get_patch_ids() could be moved into patch-ids.c now and
>> then cmd_cherry() could get its own file in builtin/, though.
>
> Right, but the key word is "could". Is it hurting _anything_ to have it
> in the current place? I doubt it.
Indeed. Moving cherry's code into its own file is be a code clean up.
There would be no benefit to users, future developers should have a
somewhat easier time navigating the code while any developers currently
working on the code would get it pulled from under them.
Such a clean up can be useful to include at the start of a patch series
that contains actual user visible improvements.
René
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-09 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-07 16:02 cmd_cherry in builtin/log.c? Thiago Farina
2010-12-07 17:39 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-12-07 18:57 ` René Scharfe
2010-12-07 20:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-12-09 21:14 ` René Scharfe [this message]
2010-12-08 11:57 ` Thiago Farina
2010-12-08 18:09 ` Jonathan Nieder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D0146BA.2090801@lsrfire.ath.cx \
--to=rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=tfransosi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).