From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Lehmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] completion: Add PS1 configuration for submodules Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:12:47 +0100 Message-ID: <4D06621F.6010101@web.de> References: <1291677763-55385-1-git-send-email-scott@appden.com> <0E479F18-B26A-4216-A71E-C65EAB41A74A@sb.org> <4CFEA249.907@web.de> <20101207212949.GA25162@burratino> <20101212063848.GB17185@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Scott Kyle , Kevin Ballard , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C6var_Arnfj=F6r=F0?= , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 13 19:13:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSCts-0002J2-6t for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:13:28 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752912Ab0LMSNN (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:13:13 -0500 Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de ([217.72.192.234]:35611 "EHLO fmmailgate03.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751146Ab0LMSNJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:13:09 -0500 Received: from smtp02.web.de ( [172.20.0.184]) by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA92D17D85118; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:12:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from [93.240.111.220] (helo=[192.168.178.51]) by smtp02.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #24) id 1PSCtL-0006gs-00; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:12:56 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 In-Reply-To: <20101212063848.GB17185@burratino> X-Sender: Jens.Lehmann@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX197z49GwrNBgbQ6xd4/onGGMuq3UxqrHQyX2CNU ZWlERDN38+M6t8FpsAwxhS1RHxgjPzbjTzkOY7OEWwBPDjyD4/ /5G+Pag/B+N95GbmphCQ== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 12.12.2010 07:38, schrieb Jonathan Nieder: > Scott Kyle wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >>> Scott Kyle wrote: > >>>> If I set the "submodule..ignore" then diffing around inside my >>>> history will not show the changes to that particular submodule. >>> >>> Even if you set it to "dirty"? >> >> Setting it to "dirty" is far less disruptive, you're right, but that >> wouldn't do me much good since my submodules are often on different >> branches while developing. > > Ah, I see now. How about something like this? Untested, just a > vague sketch to show the idea. Me thinks your proposal of a new "worktree" option makes sense. Let's hear what Scott says ...