From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: GIT Mailing-list <git@vger.kernel.org>,
normalperson@yhbt.net, avarab@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] lib-git-svn.sh: Add check for missing mod_dav_svn module
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:00:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0A6FC0.5030106@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v8vzsuq48.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> writes:
>> diff --git a/t/lib-git-svn.sh b/t/lib-git-svn.sh
>> index 919d45a..154f3d3 100644
>> --- a/t/lib-git-svn.sh
>> +++ b/t/lib-git-svn.sh
>> @@ -101,6 +101,11 @@ start_httpd () {
>> echo >&2 'SVN_HTTPD_PORT is not defined!'
>> return
>> fi
>> + if test ! -e "$SVN_HTTPD_MODULE_PATH/mod_dav_svn.so"
>> + then
>> + echo >&2 'Apache module "mod_dav_svn.so" not found'
>> + return 1
>> + fi
>
> Others seem to check with "test -f" for things like this.
OK, do you want me to send an updated patch?
> Also why "return 1" only on this codepath?
This test, along with t9115-*.sh, t9118-*.sh and t9120-*.sh, have
been written in such a way that it can access the svn repo using
either file or http urls. By default (SVN_HTTPD_PORT not set), it
uses file urls so that, despite it noisily printing to stderr that
"SVN_HTTPD_PORT is not defined!", lack of an Apache installation is
not a problem. (In fact, I suspect very few people run it with
SVN_HTTPD_PORT defined).
So, the initial test (of SVN_HTTPD_PORT) and return is not particularly
noteworthy, let alone an error. (Yes I have a patch to remove the
message, see below). However, *if* the user requests the test be run
with http urls and the mod_sav_svn.so module is missing, then we want
to fail the test noisily; thus we return 1.
Note that we could easily reset SVN_HTTPD_PORT and return, thus silently
converting to the "use file urls" case, but I don't think that would be
acceptable.
The reason I didn't submit the patch to remove the above message is
because I felt I should add a note about how/why you would use the
SVN_HTTPD_PORT variable to the t/README file. However, that started
me thinking about other similar variables like:
SVN_HTTPD_{PATH,MODULE_PATH}, LIB_HTTPD_{PATH,PORT,SSL,DAV,SVN},
GIT_SVN_NO_OPTIMIZE_COMMITS, GIT_TEST_HTTPD, .....
So, that patch never got finished! :-P
ATB,
Ramsay Jones
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-16 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-14 18:23 [PATCH 04/14] lib-git-svn.sh: Add check for missing mod_dav_svn module Ramsay Jones
2010-12-14 19:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-12-16 20:00 ` Ramsay Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D0A6FC0.5030106@ramsay1.demon.co.uk \
--to=ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=normalperson@yhbt.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox