git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@gmail.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, GIT Development <git@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: GNU Autoconf mailing list <autoconf@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: fatal: ambiguous message
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 10:03:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D20BE0B.6040104@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D1DFF96.4010004@redhat.com>

On 12/31/10 08:06, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 12/30/2010 06:37 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is this fatal?  If so, how come it continued?
> 
> It's fatal to git-version-gen, which did not continue.

git-version-gen has but two fatal conditions: invalid arguments
yielding a usage message and an unreadable "tarball version file".
That is not this message, but might be clarified with:

    v=`cat $tarball_version_file 2>&1` || {
        echo "$0 error: unreadable tarball version file $1:  $v" >&2
        exit 1
    }

In any event, the invocation is:
   ./git-version-gen .tarball-version
and the file ".tarball-version" does not exist, hence git-version-gen
should not fail at all.  So, this message says, "fatal: ..."
and comes from git and all three "git" invocations redirect stderr to
/dev/null.  The fact that we see it is a git bug.  Error messages
should be directed to stderr and thus written to /dev/null.

So, git-version-gen is correct to continue, but git should fail
with a message that names the program that fails ("git") and
should direct the message to stderr.

Note to GIT list: the message in question:

    fatal: ambiguous argument 'v0.1..HEAD': unknown revision \
       or path not in the working tree.

Thanks!  Regards, Bruce

       reply	other threads:[~2011-01-02 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4D1D33D7.7040809@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <4D1DFF96.4010004@redhat.com>
2011-01-02 18:03   ` Bruce Korb [this message]
2011-01-02 18:34     ` fatal: ambiguous message Jonathan Nieder
2011-01-03  0:16       ` Bruce Korb
2011-01-03 15:04         ` Eric Blake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D20BE0B.6040104@gmail.com \
    --to=bruce.korb@gmail.com \
    --cc=autoconf@gnu.org \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).