From: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git pull: Remove option handling done by fetch
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:57:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4F273C.8030003@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110206220939.GC17210@elie>
Am 06.02.2011 23:09, schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> Jens Lehmann wrote:
>> Am 06.02.2011 21:45, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>> Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> writes:
>
>>>> Yes, but isn't that exactly what the pull man-page says? Quote:
>>>> "Options meant for git pull itself and the underlying git merge
>>>> must be given before the options meant for git fetch."
>>>
>>> Yes, it says that, and I think that was a weasely way to say "the command
>>> line parser in git-pull is broken".
> [...]
>> (CCed Jonathan, as he is the author of the lines I quoted)
>
> They're from Junio. :) See v1.5.4.5~26 (git-pull documentation: warn
> about the option order, 2008-03-10).
And I thought I could trust "git blame -M -C" ... ;-)
> I also agree that (1) it would be very nice to find a way to fix this
> and (2) until then, it seems best as a general principle not to
> regress in those odd cases where we sort of fixed it.
>
> In other words, if we were adding --recurse-submodules today, I'd
> agree that it should be treated like other fetch options, but we
> already added the option and some people/scripts might be used to
> the added flexibility, no?
Ok, even though that option was added only two months ago, somebody
could already use it. So that leaves option two:
1) Drop the patch I proposed
2) Document "--[no-]recurse-submodules" as " as "git pull" options
(And then I can later pass the same option to "git merge", which is
much better than the solutions I came up with ;-)
Maybe something like this?
-------------8<--------------
Subject: [PATCH] pull: Document the "--[no-]recurse-submodules" options
In commits be254a0ea9 and 7dce19d374 the handling of the new fetch options
"--[no-]recurse-submodules" had been added to git-pull.sh. But they were
not documented as the pull options they now are, so let's fix that.
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
---
Documentation/fetch-options.txt | 2 +-
Documentation/git-pull.txt | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/fetch-options.txt b/Documentation/fetch-options.txt
index 695696d..ab0dbfc 100644
--- a/Documentation/fetch-options.txt
+++ b/Documentation/fetch-options.txt
@@ -64,11 +64,11 @@ ifndef::git-pull[]
downloaded. The default behavior for a remote may be
specified with the remote.<name>.tagopt setting. See
linkgit:git-config[1].
-endif::git-pull[]
--[no-]recurse-submodules::
This option controls if new commits of all populated submodules should
be fetched too (see linkgit:git-config[1] and linkgit:gitmodules[5]).
+endif::git-pull[]
ifndef::git-pull[]
--submodule-prefix=<path>::
diff --git a/Documentation/git-pull.txt b/Documentation/git-pull.txt
index 3046691..7d0f601 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-pull.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-pull.txt
@@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ must be given before the options meant for 'git fetch'.
--verbose::
Pass --verbose to git-fetch and git-merge.
+--[no-]recurse-submodules::
+ This option controls if new commits of all populated submodules should
+ be fetched too (see linkgit:git-config[1] and linkgit:gitmodules[5]).
+
Options related to merging
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
1.7.4.31.g5ae186.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-06 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-04 20:17 [PATCH] git pull: Remove option handling done by fetch Jens Lehmann
2011-02-04 22:26 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-02-05 11:26 ` Jens Lehmann
2011-02-06 20:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-06 21:59 ` Jens Lehmann
2011-02-06 22:09 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-06 22:57 ` Jens Lehmann [this message]
2011-02-07 7:41 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-07 19:27 ` [PATCH v2] pull: Document the "--[no-]recurse-submodules" options Jens Lehmann
2011-02-07 21:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-07 22:24 ` [PATCH v3] " Jens Lehmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D4F273C.8030003@web.de \
--to=jens.lehmann@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).