From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rafael Kitover Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixes for ActiveState Perl Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:59:21 -0500 Organization: CPAN Message-ID: <4D645BE9.1040904@io.com> References: <4D5914C1.9050008@io.com> <4D5984DD.1030004@io.com> <4D5A6847.90804@io.com> <4D5D2B95.2060506@io.com> Reply-To: rkitover@io.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 23 01:59:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ps34z-0007dt-Q3 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 01:59:46 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753561Ab1BWA7l (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:59:41 -0500 Received: from smtp.prismnet.com ([209.198.128.91]:54995 "EHLO smtp.prismnet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751634Ab1BWA7k (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:59:40 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-76-98-235-160.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.98.235.160]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.prismnet.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1N0xb6V071028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:59:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rkitover@io.com) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=10.0 tests=MISSING_HEADERS,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on smtp.prismnet.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2/20/2011 6:58 AM, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > Heya, > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 15:07, Rafael Kitover wrote: >> I put a lot of work into this patch...what do I do with it now? > > Step one would be to keep those who are interested cc-ed. If they > agree that the new version is sound, cc Junio to have it merged to > next. > Please don't include this patch, I sent a much better patch to the msysGit list...