Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] git-add: rename -u to -a

[Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>]

Miles Bader venit, vidit, dixit 28.02.2011 09:42:
> Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:
>> - "commit -a,--add <addopts>" be "add <addopts> && commit", and
> 
> Can you give an example?  It look like you're proposing that the user
> would have to type "commit -a -u", which is pretty gross for a fairly
> common operation that already has a good shorthand...

Not again, please. I don't even know what to give an example for, given
how much you cut down my post. In the last part of my post (the
"radical" part), I explained why we don't need "-u" any more, because
it's the new default. So, obviously (obvious from the parts you cut),
"commit -a" would do what it always did.

And would you please try and follow our netiquete here? I had promised
myself not to respond any more, but see how I'm still forgiving. Try and
deserve it :)

Michael