From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Miseler Subject: Re: Summer of Code project ideas due this Friday Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 20:47:07 +0100 Message-ID: <4D7BCDBB.7080604@miseler.de> References: <20110303185918.GA18503@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110303203323.GA21102@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110309174956.GA22683@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110309215841.GC4400@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4D794531.40205@miseler.de> <20110310221809.GB15828@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4D7A2EFC.3020505@miseler.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Shawn Pearce , Ramkumar Ramachandra , Jonathan Nieder , Jens Lehmann , Christian Couder , Thomas Rast , git To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Mar 12 20:47:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PyUmk-0006rD-Ec for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 20:47:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754545Ab1CLTrS (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:47:18 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:52025 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752168Ab1CLTrS (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:47:18 -0500 Received: from [192.168.22.13] (f055073147.adsl.alicedsl.de [78.55.73.147]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LbPII-1QM29A13uM-00kLXK; Sat, 12 Mar 2011 20:47:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 In-Reply-To: <4D7A2EFC.3020505@miseler.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:EvnItQntpQBQPTkplMzLZ5UaVCkTscgm8fjJO2qerRu kyq/qDD8wmoLwpI22nO6EVPIP8GeRIYCjem4yLnXCKUBjVSTBR ziUiy+JdgvflNlFhSl6usgbmJUQQwt84+6V/1WVNfAc3Bc/GD5 ychShAtjsCvONaK8sRsmqYtRpdBqHokdvrYK5WN2a9fDxltgYv 2dz9XDyQl1DX68AdhTLEQ== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: >>> Even worse yet, commits consisting of smaller files but with a >>> combined size over the limit will also cause out-of-memories. >> >> That generally should work OK. The diff and packing code tries to keep >> memory usage reasonable, which generally equates to two times the >> largest file. If you have a test case that shows problems, there may >> very well be a bug. > > I will look into it. I failed to create an artificial test case for this (thus probably misunderstanding the exact circumstances leading to this). I will investigate it when I get a real life test case again.