From: Piotr Krukowiecki <piotr.krukowiecki@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] git bisect run: exit code 126 and 127 abort the run
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:18:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D84C960.3010401@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vei654omv.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Those codes are reserved by POSIX to indicate
"command not executable" and "command not found":
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_08_02
Bisect used to treat them as codes returned by user
to mark a "bad" code.
With that approach it was not possible to differentiate
between codes returned by the user and codes returned by
shell (which is likely a sign of a poorly written test
script).
Another minor problem was lack of consistency in exit codes.
A "bad" code was marked by any value in range 1-124,126-127
and the gap in the middle looked weird.
Change the meaning of exit codes 126 and 127 to
"abort the bisect process" to fixes the above problems.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krukowiecki <piotr.krukowiecki@gmail.com>
---
git-bisect.sh | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
W dniu 17.03.2011 18:56, Junio C Hamano pisze:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
>> 2. If we do detect such a mishap, I'm not sure that "indeterminate
>> result" is necessarily the best result, as that will just keep
>> trying more and more commits without success. It is more likely a
>> sign of a poorly written test script, and the best thing we could
>> do is die and say "your test script looks buggy".
>
> Exactly. I agree "Aborting the bisect as run-script is a crap" is the
> right thing to do here.
Here's a patch. Next one changes git-bisect.txt
There's also Documentation/git-bisect-lk2009.txt which talks about exit
codes and should be changed somehow. As I understand it's a quote from an
email so I don't know if it should be edited in place, or should a note
be added at beginning?
(And again my patch has commit message longer than the changes...
Now I understand why in-code documentation is lacking - after writing
lengthy commit message documenting the code is just too much ;) )
diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh
index c21e33c..9ca4852 100755
--- a/git-bisect.sh
+++ b/git-bisect.sh
@@ -376,9 +376,9 @@ bisect_run () {
res=$?
# Check for really bad run error.
- if [ $res -lt 0 -o $res -ge 128 ]; then
+ if [ $res -lt 0 -o $res -ge 126 ]; then
echo >&2 "bisect run failed:"
- echo >&2 "exit code $res from '$@' is < 0 or >= 128"
+ echo >&2 "exit code $res from '$@' is < 0 or >= 126"
exit $res
fi
--
1.7.1
--
Piotr Krukowiecki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-19 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-16 20:44 git bisect code 125 - "WFT?" Piotr Krukowiecki
2011-03-16 21:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-16 22:06 ` Piotr Krukowiecki
2011-03-17 6:55 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-03-17 7:27 ` Jeff King
2011-03-17 17:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-19 15:18 ` Piotr Krukowiecki [this message]
2011-03-19 15:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] bisect documentation: exit codes 126,127 abort bisect Piotr Krukowiecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D84C960.3010401@gmail.com \
--to=piotr.krukowiecki@gmail.com \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).