From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent van Ravesteijn Subject: Re: Why can't I use git-bisect to find the first *good* commit? Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:39:12 +0200 Message-ID: <4D908170.2020207@lyx.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Git Mailing List To: =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 28 14:39:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4Bj4-0007gS-RH for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:39:19 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753215Ab1C1MjM (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:39:12 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:53587 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751919Ab1C1MjM (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:39:12 -0400 Received: by eyx24 with SMTP id 24so1131036eyx.19 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 05:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.16.100 with SMTP id g76mr523075eeg.168.1301315948014; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 05:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [145.94.168.61] (wlan-145-94-168-61.wlan.tudelft.nl [145.94.168.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q53sm2738754eeh.11.2011.03.28.05.39.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 05:39:07 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > Why can't bisect just do the right thing here and accept that your > more recent revesion is the good one, and the old one is the bad one? There was a recent discussion about this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/165433 Vincent