From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "psantosl@codicesoftware.com" Subject: git fast-import --export-marks flag Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:16:23 +0200 Message-ID: <4D90B457.9040607@codicesoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 28 18:16:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4F7M-0006uI-7F for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:16:36 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753905Ab1C1QQ3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:16:29 -0400 Received: from berith.lunarbreeze.com ([216.97.239.175]:48666 "EHLO berith.lunarbreeze.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751750Ab1C1QQ1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:16:27 -0400 Received: from 198.red-80-28-79.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net ([80.28.79.198] helo=[192.168.2.33]) by berith.lunarbreeze.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4F7A-0003Pe-DU for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:16:24 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - berith.lunarbreeze.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - codicesoftware.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, git fast-import --export-marks is able to export to a file the marks and its associated commit hashes created during import. So far I've seen the marks are not the ones provided in the input but some "internal ones" not related with the input. Wouldn't it be much better, for import/export interop, if it kept the original marks? It would be certainly easier to do incremental import/export with external systems not dealing with SHAs... Thanks, pablo