From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: enhance gitignore whitelist example
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:23:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9B8862.1050605@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201104052315.54375.j6t@kdbg.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2184 bytes --]
On 04/05/2011 03:15 PM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>>> @@ -87,7 +89,8 @@ PATTERN FORMAT
>>>
>>> - Otherwise, git treats the pattern as a shell glob suitable
>>> for consumption by fnmatch(3) with the FNM_PATHNAME flag:
>>> - wildcards in the pattern will not match a / in the pathname.
>>> + wildcards in the pattern will not match a / in the pathname,
>>> + and do not ignore files with a leading . in the pathname.
>
> I don't think this is correct. * matches .gitignore. I tried it.
That was my point. * _does_ match .gitignore, even though for normal
shell globs, FNM_PERIOD is set and * does not match .gitignore. That
is, while in the shell 'dir/*' only matches non-dot files, in .gitignore
it matches all files including dot-files.
Any ideas for a better way to word that?
> I propose a paragraph like this in the NOTES section:
>
> --- 8< ---
> When a directory is ignored, it is not possible to un-ignore a single file
> somewhere in the directory using another pattern. E.g., with the patterns
>
> --------------
> /build/
> !/build/tests/results
> --------------
>
> the file "build/tests/results" is still ignored because when a directory is
> ignored, its contents are never investigated. In a situation where a few
> exceptions in an otherwise ignored hierarchy are needed, the recommended
> procedure is to specify to ignore the root of the hierarchy and then to 'git
> add -f' the exceptional files. Subsequent changes to the files will not be
> ignored.
Yeah, but then you have to 'git add -f path/to/file' them every time you
change them, or use the sledgehammer of 'git add .'.
Does it make any better sense to document:
/build/*
!/build/*/
/build/*/*
!/build/foo/baz
which ignores all files in build, then un-ignores directories, then
ignores all files in subdirectories of build except for the desired
multi-level file under build? At which point you no longer need 'git
add -f', but can simply do 'git add build' to pick up /build/foo/baz in
one go without warning?
--
Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 619 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-05 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-05 19:36 [PATCH] Documentation: enhance gitignore whitelist example Eric Blake
2011-04-05 19:40 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-04-05 21:15 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-04-05 21:23 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2011-04-05 21:41 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-04-05 21:49 ` Eric Blake
2011-04-05 21:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-04-05 21:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-04-05 20:56 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D9B8862.1050605@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).