From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Haggerty Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2011, #04; Tue, 12) Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:21:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4DA710FB.7060808@alum.mit.edu> References: <7vaafvnl9t.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Piotr Krukowiecki X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 14 17:22:43 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QAONS-0000N6-Fh for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:22:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757537Ab1DNPWd (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:22:33 -0400 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:40877 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754636Ab1DNPWc (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:22:32 -0400 X-Envelope-From: mhagger@alum.mit.edu Received: from [192.168.100.152] (ssh.berlin.jpk.com [212.222.128.135]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id p3EFLWse025284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:21:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 04/14/2011 03:38 PM, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * mh/git-svn-automkdirs (2011-04-01) 1 commit >> (merged to 'next' on 2011-04-03 at 7fa4978) >> + git-svn: add an option to skip the creation of empty directories >> >> Should be safe, but I'd like an Ack from git-svn folks. > > I wanted to test performance of this change - what's the best way to do it? > > I tried some ideas, but rebase was too fast for performance measurements. > I did not have new commits, but just some old, already in trunk changes, which > I tried to rebase - probably it was just fast forward? The unhandled.log.gz file for trunk of our main project is 14 Mb and uncompresses to 233 Mb. About 90% of it consists of svn:mergeinfo properties for file that were copied or renamed within the repository; most of the rest is other random SVN file properties. With such a huge unhandled.log file, "git svn mkdirs" took about 10s for me. I believe that "git svn rebase" should take at least as long, even if it is a fast-forward. Michael -- Michael Haggerty mhagger@alum.mit.edu http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/