git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Kacper Kornet <kornet@camk.edu.pl>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Honor $(prefix) set in config.mak* when defining ETC_GIT* and sysconfdir
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 16:39:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC1653A.7000000@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110504135827.GC18585@camk.edu.pl>

Am 5/4/2011 15:58, schrieb Kacper Kornet:
> On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 07:52:30AM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>> Looking closer, the patch introduces git_etcdir for no good reason,
>> IIUC.
>> It should just re-use sysconfdir (the meaning of this variable is to
>> point
>> to the etc directory).
> 
> And the first version of my patch did it. However Junio has written:
> 
>> But this part in the Makefile outside the context of the patch bothers
>> me.  It seems to imply that sysconfdir is _not_ that variable you want
>> to
>> define later.
>>
>>    # Among the variables below, these:
>>    #   gitexecdir
>>    #   template_dir
>>    #   mandir
>>    #   infodir
>>    #   htmldir
>>    #   ETC_GITCONFIG (but not sysconfdir)
>>    #   ETC_GITATTRIBUTES
>>    # can be specified as a relative path some/where/else;
>>
>> So I have a suspicion that your patch as is will break when prefix is
>> set
>> to something other than /usr directory.  I don't think anybody in-tree
>> currently uses sysconfdir, but that does not mean nobody will ever do.
> 
>>From that I understood that he prefers sysconfdir to be always an
> absolute path.

Junio's worries should not be discarded lightly. But in this case they are
unfounded. Digging the history shows:

b51b8bbf (Create a sysconfdir variable, and use it for ETC_GITCONFIG,
2007-04-24) introduced the variable to be able to treat the special case
where prefix == /usr. It was never intended as a user-settable value.

In 49fa65a7 (Allow the built-in exec path to be relative to the command
invocation path, 2008-07-23), I added the comment above because at that
time, a relocatable build should be requested by setting ETC_GITCONFIG to
a relative path, but not by changing sysconfdir. (The comment sounds as if
the user can set sysconfdir, but I did not intend to say that.)

026fa0d5 (Move computation of absolute paths from Makefile to runtime (in
preparation for RUNTIME_PREFIX), 2009-01-18) practically obsoleted
sysconfdir. In particular, it removed one of the cases where the value of
sysconfdir mattered, leaving only the reference where it is guaranteed to
be set to /etc. This commit could have removed sysconfdir entirely.

6df42ab9 (Add global and system-wide gitattributes, 2010-09-01) added
another consumer of sysconfdir, but in the same spirit as ETC_GITCONFIG.

So, I don't think that sysconfdir must survive. It was always only a
helper variable to shorten the code.

-- Hannes

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-04 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-28  2:29 [PATCH] Respect definition of prefix from autotools in ETC_GITCONFIG and ETC_GITATTRIBUTES Kacper Kornet
2011-04-28 16:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-04-28 17:49   ` Kacper Kornet
2011-04-28 19:27   ` [PATCH 1/1] Honor $(prefix) set in config.mak* when defining ETC_GIT* and sysconfdir Kacper Kornet
2011-04-28 20:01     ` [PATCH] Honor sysconfdir when set as an configure option Kacper Kornet
2011-04-28 21:05       ` Junio C Hamano
2011-04-28 21:22         ` Kacper Kornet
2011-05-03  6:42     ` [PATCH 1/1] Honor $(prefix) set in config.mak* when defining ETC_GIT* and sysconfdir Johannes Sixt
2011-05-03 17:32       ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-04  5:52         ` Johannes Sixt
2011-05-04 13:58           ` Kacper Kornet
2011-05-04 14:39             ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2011-05-04 18:21               ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-05  2:26                 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-05  5:58                   ` Johannes Sixt
2011-05-05 16:17                     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-06  7:03                       ` Johannes Sixt
2011-05-05 14:29                   ` Kacper Kornet
2011-05-05 14:45                     ` Johannes Sixt
2011-05-05 15:00                       ` Kacper Kornet
2011-05-05 15:46                         ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-09  8:24                           ` Johannes Sixt
2011-05-09 11:56                             ` Kacper Kornet
2011-05-27  8:17                             ` Kacper Kornet
2011-05-05 15:25                       ` Kacper Kornet
2011-05-04 14:29         ` Kacper Kornet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DC1653A.7000000@viscovery.net \
    --to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=kornet@camk.edu.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).