git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
To: Michael Horowitz <michael.horowitz@ieee.org>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git-p4 and keyword substitution
Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 20:29:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC44C33.7060903@diamand.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinLW3Ty4n1ODKU-N000q7qQUoSDTQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/05/11 18:26, Michael Horowitz wrote:
> All,
>
> I was wondering if there is a way to deal with this issue...
>
> It seems that git removes the keyword substitutions from Perforce.
> This is fine, except for the fact that it does not remove them from
> the p4 client shadow.  So, this causes git-p4 submit to fail whenever
> it either deletes a file with keywords (since the file it is deleting
> has the keywords and doesn't match) or lines close to the keywords
> change, such that applying the patch doesn't work.
>
> A Google search turned up a thread from a few years ago where someone
> submitted a patch to make removing the keyword substitutions optional,
> but I guess that patch never got accepted, at least not that I can
> see.
>
> Is there any other way of dealing with this?

I had exactly the same problem only yesterday, and found exactly the 
same thread!

I made a patch to git-p4 which zaps the RCS keywords in the perforce 
checkout if a conflict occurs.

I got as far as something which works if you just delete a line, but 
fails if you delete the entire file. And is a bit ugly.

I was going to ask the exact question you've asked though, to see if 
there's a better way.

Luke

      reply	other threads:[~2011-05-06 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-06 17:26 git-p4 and keyword substitution Michael Horowitz
2011-05-06 19:29 ` Luke Diamand [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DC44C33.7060903@diamand.org \
    --to=luke@diamand.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.horowitz@ieee.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).