From: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>
To: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] better handle .gitmodules merge conflicts
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:01:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DCD47B5.8050505@xiplink.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DCC4A9D.3060007@web.de>
On 11-05-12 05:01 PM, Jens Lehmann wrote:
> This series contains a test to reproduce and a first attempt to fix the
> problem that "git diff", "git status" and "git fetch" die early when the
> .gitmodules file contains merge conflict markers. As I am not aware of any
> bug reports yet it looks like that either doesn't happen very often in the
> wild ("git diff" parses the .gitmodules file since 1.7.3, but even as
> heavy submodule users we only hit this once just recently) or the users
> encountering this problem just know what to do: resolve the conflict and
> carry on.
I fell in the latter camp when I ran into this.
I like to examine conflicts with "git gui" but IIRC it doesn't display any
conflicting files when there's a conflict in .gitmodules (it won't even
display conflicts in other files, presumably because some plumbing failed
early on the .gitmodules conflict). That was quite a "WTF?" moment...
> But that is no excuse to behave so unfriendly, especially as this can
> happen in a completely normal workflow, when e.g. two users are adding
> different submodules in separate branches and they get merged. So this
> RFC patch is my first attempt to avoid those commands dying.
Yup -- thanks for addressing this!
M.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-13 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-12 21:01 [RFC PATCH 0/2] better handle .gitmodules merge conflicts Jens Lehmann
2011-05-12 21:02 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] test that git status works with merge conflict in .gitmodules Jens Lehmann
2011-05-13 5:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-12 21:03 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] Submodules: Don't parse .gitmodules when it contains merge conflicts Jens Lehmann
2011-05-13 6:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-13 15:01 ` Marc Branchaud [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DCD47B5.8050505@xiplink.com \
--to=marcnarc@xiplink.com \
--cc=Jens.Lehmann@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).