From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: AAARGH bisection is hard (Re: [2.6.39 regression] X locks up hard right after logging in) Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 20:47:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4DCD7CBE.9010409@kdbg.org> References: <4DCD79A0.7000500@kdbg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Lutomirski , Christian Couder , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org, Shuang He To: Linus Torvalds X-From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 13 20:47:47 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: glk-linux-kernel-3@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKxOt-0002P0-8T for glk-linux-kernel-3@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:47:47 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757302Ab1EMSrk (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2011 14:47:40 -0400 Received: from bsmtp4.bon.at ([195.3.86.186]:39521 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751219Ab1EMSri (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2011 14:47:38 -0400 Received: from dx.sixt.local (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7D7A7EB4; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:43:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.sixt.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id C593619F393; Fri, 13 May 2011 20:47:26 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 SUSE/3.1.10 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 13.05.2011 20:41, schrieb Linus Torvalds: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote: >> git bisect good v2.6.38 > > When you say that v2.6.38 is good, that means that everything that can > be reached from 2.6.38 is good. > > NOT AT ALL the same thing as "git bisect requires v2.6.38" would be. > > Think about it. It's the "reachable from v2.6.38" vs "cannot reach > v2.6.38" difference. That's a HUGE difference. Oops, you're right, I got it upside-down. Thanks, -- Hannes