From: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "David Aguilar" <davvid@gmail.com>,
"Frédéric Heitzmann" <frederic.heitzmann@gmail.com>,
"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] setup: Provide GIT_PREFIX to built-ins
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:23:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDB5CFE.4090409@drmicha.warpmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v8vtxweoh.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 23.05.2011 18:43:
> David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I guess external scripts can call rev-parse --show-prefix themselves?
>
> That has always been the case, I think, and it shouldn't be a problem.
>
> The real reason you want the new GIT_PREFIX for alias/hooks is otherwise
> they would not have a way to even say --show-prefix to figure it out
> themselves.
>
>>> Overall I think it's a good change, btw. But it leaves it up to the
>>> (script) user to know whether git has actually changed the cwd or not,
>>> i.e.: Is $(pwd) where the user called us from or $(pwd)/$GIT_PREFIX?
>
> As long as there is a way for a script to figure it out when it wants to
> know, I think it should be Ok.
>
> Isn't it just the matter of reading --show-prefix and comparing it with
> what came in $GIT_PREFIX?
Yep, one is before and one is after any eventual cd'ing which git may
do. I just wanted to point out the difference. And the technical
difference (env var. vs. rev-parse option) is due to that difference
(and thus natural).
Michael
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-24 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-14 14:25 git difftool does does not respect current working directory Frédéric Heitzmann
2011-05-16 5:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-20 3:59 ` David Aguilar
2011-05-20 4:10 ` David Aguilar
2011-05-20 4:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-20 4:48 ` David Aguilar
2011-05-21 9:35 ` Frédéric Heitzmann
2011-05-22 6:14 ` David Aguilar
2011-05-22 6:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-22 6:50 ` David Aguilar
2011-05-22 9:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] setup: Provide GIT_PREFIX to built-ins David Aguilar
2011-05-22 9:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] git: Remove handling for GIT_PREFIX David Aguilar
2011-05-22 9:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] git-mergetool--lib: Make vimdiff retain the current directory David Aguilar
2011-05-23 6:36 ` Michael J Gruber
2011-05-23 19:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-23 12:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] setup: Provide GIT_PREFIX to built-ins Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2011-05-25 4:19 ` David Aguilar
[not found] ` <1306058055-93672-1-git-send-email-davvid@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4DDA0044.2060207@drmicha.warpmail.net>
2011-05-23 8:40 ` David Aguilar
2011-05-23 9:58 ` Michael J Gruber
2011-05-23 16:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-24 7:23 ` Michael J Gruber [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDB5CFE.4090409@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--to=git@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--cc=davvid@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic.heitzmann@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).