From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@cesarb.net>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: msysgit@googlegroups.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [msysGit] [PATCH] Embed an application manifest on MinGW
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 18:07:36 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DE16418.4020002@cesarb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.1105282241510.11411@bonsai2>
Em 28-05-2011 17:44, Johannes Schindelin escreveu:
> On Sat, 28 May 2011, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
>> [...]
>> @@ -1551,6 +1554,11 @@ ifdef USE_NED_ALLOCATOR
>> COMPAT_OBJS += compat/nedmalloc/nedmalloc.o
>> endif
>>
>> +ifdef APPLICATION_MANIFEST
>> + # Cannot be in LIB_OBJS because it must always be linked in
>> + RESOURCE_OBJS += compat/win32/resource.o
>> +endif
>> +
>> ifdef GIT_TEST_CMP_USE_COPIED_CONTEXT
>> export GIT_TEST_CMP_USE_COPIED_CONTEXT
>> endif
>> [...]
>>
>> -git$X: git.o $(BUILTIN_OBJS) $(GITLIBS)
>> +git$X: git.o $(BUILTIN_OBJS) $(RESOURCE_OBJS) $(GITLIBS)
>> [...]
>>
>> -git-%$X: %.o $(GITLIBS)
>> +git-%$X: %.o $(RESOURCE_OBJS) $(GITLIBS)
>> [...]
>
> Is it possible that adding the resource object to GITLIBS would reduce the
> patch and be "more correct", too?
I thought about it, but it felt wrong. It is not a library, it is an object.
Also, while adding it to GITLIBS would add the object to all the right
rules (in fact, I did a search for GITLIBS to find all the places to add
the new object to), I believe it would get the object linked twice in
some of the rules (the ones which do a $(filter %.o,$^) would get it
both from GITLIBS via the filter and from GITLIBS via $(LIBS) on the
command line).
--
Cesar Eduardo Barros
cesarb@cesarb.net
cesar.barros@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-28 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-28 19:58 [PATCH] Embed an application manifest on MinGW Cesar Eduardo Barros
2011-05-28 20:44 ` [msysGit] " Johannes Schindelin
2011-05-28 21:07 ` Cesar Eduardo Barros [this message]
2011-05-28 21:19 ` Johannes Schindelin
2011-05-28 21:50 ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DE16418.4020002@cesarb.net \
--to=cesarb@cesarb.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msysgit@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).