From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: Q: how can i find the upstream merge point of a commit? Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:32:19 +0200 Message-ID: <4DEF4FB3.1020400@viscovery.net> References: <20110608093648.GA19038@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Stephen Rothwell , Linus Torvalds To: Ingo Molnar X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 08 12:32:32 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QUG3r-0000Xv-U9 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:32:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755025Ab1FHKc1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 06:32:27 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:33026 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754198Ab1FHKc0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 06:32:26 -0400 Received: from cpe228-254-static.liwest.at ([81.10.228.254] helo=theia.linz.viscovery) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QUG3g-0006ar-A6; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:32:20 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.95]) by theia.linz.viscovery (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B5F1660F; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:32:19 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: <20110608093648.GA19038@elte.hu> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 6/8/2011 11:36, schrieb Ingo Molnar: > So for example when was 189d3c4a94 merged upstream? > > The proper Git answer would be: > > $ git describe --contains 189d3c4a94 > next-20080501~97 > > But the next-20080501 tag is useless, and i don't have linux-next as > HEAD, it's only a remote. > ... > But ... it would be much nicer if i could make 'git describe > --contains' work better. $ git describe --contains --match 'v2.*' 189d3c4a94 -- Hannes