From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Ericsson Subject: Re: Git is not scalable with too many refs/* Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:17:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4DF6A8B6.9030301@op5.se> References: <4DF0EC32.40001@gmail.com> <20110609162604.GC25885@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff King , Shawn Pearce , A Large Angry SCM , Sverre Rabbelier , git To: NAKAMURA Takumi X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 14 02:18:17 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWHKd-0003Py-Ds for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:18:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755458Ab1FNASG (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:18:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:56762 "EHLO mail-ew0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755376Ab1FNASE (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:18:04 -0400 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so1789906ewy.19 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.113.146 with SMTP id a18mr3054413ebq.121.1308010680434; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vix.int.op5.se (c83-248-99-226.bredband.comhem.se [83.248.99.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v76sm2542367eea.3.2011.06.13.17.17.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:17:59 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10 ThunderGit/0.1a In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 06/10/2011 05:59 AM, NAKAMURA Takumi wrote: > Good afternoon Git! Thank you guys to give me comments. > > Jakub and Shawn, > > Sure, Notes should be used at the case, I agree. > >> (eg. git log --oneline --decorate shows me each svn revision) > > My example might misunderstand you. I intended tags could show me > pretty abbrev everywhere on Git. I would be happier if tags might be > available bi-directional alias, as Stephen mentions. > > It would be better git-svn could record metadata into notes, I think, too. :D > > Stephen, > > 2011/6/10 Stephen Bash: >> I've seen two different workflows develop: >> 1) Hacking on some code in Git the programmer finds something wrong. Using Git tools he can pickaxe/bisect/etc. and find that the problem traces back to a commit imported from Subversion. >> 2) The programmer finds something wrong, asks coworker, coworker says "see bug XYZ", bug XYZ says "Fixed in r20356". >> >> I agree notes is the right answer for (1), but for (2) you really want a cross reference table from Subversion rev number to Git commit. > If you're using svn metadata in the commit text, you can always do "git log -p --grep=@20356" to get the commits relevant to that one. It's not as fast as "git show svn-20356", but it's not exactly glacial either and would avoid the problems you're having now. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war on peace.