From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: GIT Mailing-list <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
johan@herland.net
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] config.c: Make git_config() work correctly when called recursively
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:55:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFA5FCD.6080902@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110614182726.GA451@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:19:19PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
[...]
>> I could, of course, have simply changed the expect file so that it would pass
>> the test, but I wanted the change to be self-contained and to pass all existing
>> tests (ie. the external interface/behaviour should *not* change).
>
> No, you did the right thing here. The information on which config file
> we're in is valuable, and taking away the globals is not worth the pain
> of making all of the callers and callbacks of git_config have to deal
> with passing around a context struct.
>
> So the patch you posted looks good to me.
Thanks! (I will abandon the search for an alternate solution! ;-)
I think the commit message needs to be re-worded before actually submitting
the patch (it's fine for an RFC, but the call-chain info has a limited shelf
life and should go).
Also, I wanted to re-submit two additional patches in that branch; last time
they didn't even make it to pu! Hopefully they will take at least one step
further this time.
ATB,
Ramsay Jones
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-16 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-09 17:45 [RFC/PATCH] config.c: Make git_config() work correctly when called recursively Ramsay Jones
2011-06-09 20:39 ` Jeff King
2011-06-14 18:19 ` Ramsay Jones
2011-06-14 18:27 ` Jeff King
2011-06-16 19:55 ` Ramsay Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DFA5FCD.6080902@ramsay1.demon.co.uk \
--to=ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johan@herland.net \
--cc=kusmabite@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).