From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luke Diamand Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] git-p4 test cleanup, commit time change Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:49:41 +0100 Message-ID: <4E352535.4060804@diamand.org> References: <20110731003557.GA4867@arf.padd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Pete Wyckoff X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jul 31 11:54:32 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QnSj9-0006Vf-SI for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 11:54:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752156Ab1GaJtr (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 05:49:47 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:57318 "EHLO mail-ww0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751750Ab1GaJtq (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 05:49:46 -0400 Received: by wwg11 with SMTP id 11so804613wwg.1 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 02:49:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.27.137 with SMTP id i9mr3883112wbc.28.1312105784690; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 02:49:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [86.30.143.167] (cpc4-cmbg14-2-0-cust166.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [86.30.143.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k84sm2563578weq.46.2011.07.31.02.49.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 02:49:43 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110402 Iceowl/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.9 In-Reply-To: <20110731003557.GA4867@arf.padd.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 31/07/11 01:35, Pete Wyckoff wrote: > Here's a small patch series to clean up the git-p4 tests a bit, > make them work on a 2-user eval p4d, and to fix a problem with > the timestamp on the import commit. > > Luke, if you can take a look and ack these, I'd appreciate > the review since I had to adjust your --preserveUser tests. > And if you're looking at that one, might as well look at them > all. :) > > I'd welcome review from anyone with interest, and will plan > to submit these to Junio in a week or so. Just looking at them now. One thing though - are you sure the p4d demo license only allows 2 users? I've only ever used the demo p4d for testing and it seems to work fine (just tried again with version P4D/LINUX26X86_64/2010.2/322263). The web page says this: "The free Perforce Server supports two users and five client workspaces, or unlimited users and up to 1,000 files. Request a 45-day evaluation license to support any number of users and unlimited files." Which I assume means the test harness couldn't have more than 1000 files and some unspecified number of client workspaces? I've just created 4 users by hand with no obvious problems. I'm pretty sure I'm not accidentally using the corporate server! Confuzzled!