From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luke Diamand Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] git-p4 test cleanup, commit time change Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:01:12 +0100 Message-ID: <4E357C48.5090409@diamand.org> References: <20110731003557.GA4867@arf.padd.com> <4E352535.4060804@diamand.org> <20110731134237.GA6564@arf.padd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Pete Wyckoff X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jul 31 18:01:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QnYS9-0003n9-K9 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 18:01:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752148Ab1GaQBR (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 12:01:17 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:43586 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752106Ab1GaQBQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 12:01:16 -0400 Received: by wwe5 with SMTP id 5so4900650wwe.1 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.178.6 with SMTP id bk6mr2552627wbb.12.1312128075239; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [86.30.143.167] (cpc4-cmbg14-2-0-cust166.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [86.30.143.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fo2sm3442765wbb.14.2011.07.31.09.01.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:01:14 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110402 Iceowl/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.9 In-Reply-To: <20110731134237.GA6564@arf.padd.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 31/07/11 14:42, Pete Wyckoff wrote: > luke@diamand.org wrote on Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:49 +0100: >> One thing though - are you sure the p4d demo license only allows 2 >> users? I've only ever used the demo p4d for testing and it seems to >> work fine (just tried again with version >> P4D/LINUX26X86_64/2010.2/322263). > > You are so right. I was using an older p4d (2009.1/222893) at > home, and didn't even think about checking for updates. > > There was one line in patch 3 that should survive, just to add a > "&&". I've added your acks for the rest and will repost to show > the current changes. All looks good to me! Luke