From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] shell portability: Use sed instead of non-portable variable expansion Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:21:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4E64869D.8060601@viscovery.net> References: <8762l73758.fsf@elisp.net> <4E647442.9000005@viscovery.net> <7v7h5nxxwf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4E647BD5.8060609@viscovery.net> <7v39gbxwi6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4E648546.8060303@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , Naohiro Aota , git@vger.kernel.org, tarmigan+git@gmail.com To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 05 10:21:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R0URJ-0008HJ-Td for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:21:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750791Ab1IEIVx (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2011 04:21:53 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:29319 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751469Ab1IEIVv (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2011 04:21:51 -0400 Received: from cpe228-254-static.liwest.at ([81.10.228.254] helo=theia.linz.viscovery) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R0URC-0006gI-0D; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:21:50 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.95]) by theia.linz.viscovery (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77421660F; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:21:49 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/3.1.13 In-Reply-To: <4E648546.8060303@viscovery.net> X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 9/5/2011 10:16, schrieb Johannes Sixt: > The most visible difference is a backslash that is followed by a character > that is not special: I should have said: "The difference that I can see immediately is...". I suspect there are other subtle differences that are not so obvious to me. -- Hannes