From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc5 Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:26:39 -0300 Message-ID: <4E65307F.5020103@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , git@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 05 22:27:31 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R0flS-0002bq-N0 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 22:27:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753842Ab1IEU1R (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:27:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4055 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753780Ab1IEU1Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:27:16 -0400 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p85KQgjY002589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:26:42 -0400 Received: from [10.11.8.165] (vpn-8-165.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.8.165]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p85KQdsN031247; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:26:40 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.12 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Em 04-09-2011 20:27, Linus Torvalds escreveu: > One thing to note: If you just do > > git pull https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git > > you probably won't get the tags, since it's not your origin branch. So do > > git fetch --tags<...> > > too, so that you get not only the actual changes, but the tag that you > can verify too. > It would be great if "git remote update" could also verify the tag signature (if present), as most of us just do a "git remote update". Maybe an extra parameter for git config remote.tagopt? Ok, if in doubt, we can always use git tag -v , but doing it automagically would help us to detect if a git tag got mangled by some at the moment we update our trees, with seems to be a good idea. Thanks, Mauro