From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael J Gruber Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc5 Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:23:39 +0200 Message-ID: <4E65CA7B.5050803@drmicha.warpmail.net> References: <4E65307F.5020103@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , git@vger.kernel.org To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab X-From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 06 09:24:10 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: glk-linux-kernel-3@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R0q0u-0006kb-2F for glk-linux-kernel-3@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:24:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753258Ab1IFHXr (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 03:23:47 -0400 Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:56302 "EHLO out2.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752936Ab1IFHXl (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 03:23:41 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC1E23B18; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 03:23:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 06 Sep 2011 03:23:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=5Zn930oZNBfJwT9ohP+2Wd aNhZo=; b=aIwtT8tGlCXehLQOaJeS6s60uNKhOR+VCiJEJNRdGDTGv4Mm7FjRQC +CRTr3L8f9jylCmMrJhUDjevQBkwCJSUbtIlul/4ntpC8aZ782RCUfvNoaEh/w2l FlmXVHwxtwjz4tYMS8xU57xBRiJgzWkYqoF6Cfkr5uO0vTJ2bOr/g= X-Sasl-enc: ZS6KzkKj/lW02Ap48BA1dk3dtV0YtrslZ9C7k5GqRb4l 1315293820 Received: from localhost.localdomain (whitehead.math.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.44.62]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D9598206CA; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 03:23:40 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 In-Reply-To: <4E65307F.5020103@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Mauro Carvalho Chehab venit, vidit, dixit 05.09.2011 22:26: > Em 04-09-2011 20:27, Linus Torvalds escreveu: > >> One thing to note: If you just do >> >> git pull https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git >> >> you probably won't get the tags, since it's not your origin branch. So do >> >> git fetch --tags<...> >> >> too, so that you get not only the actual changes, but the tag that you >> can verify too. >> > > It would be great if "git remote update" could also verify the tag > signature (if present), as most of us just do a "git remote update". ...when you should "git fetch --all" ;) > Maybe an extra parameter for git config remote.tagopt? > > Ok, if in doubt, we can always use git tag -v , but doing > it automagically would help us to detect if a git tag got mangled > by some at the moment we update our trees, with seems to be > a good idea. The update hook (if you want to reject falsified tags) or post-update hook (if you want to be warned) is the perfect place for this. It would be worth amending the standard update hook, me thinks, after removing its insisting on a project description, and maybe switching the defaults. Michael