From: "Tajti Ákos" <akos.tajti@intland.com>
To: mfwitten@gmail.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about right-only
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:42:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E663F62.7030603@intland.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ec1404d75fd6461fa731f31625126884-mfwitten@gmail.com>
Thanks four your answer, it was really great help (cleared up everything)!
Best regards,
Ákos Tajti
2011.09.06. 17:24 keltezéssel, mfwitten@gmail.com írta:
> On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:44:50 +0200, Tajti wrote:
>
>> what does the right-only option of git-log actually do? The manual is
>> not too verbose about it.
> The documentation is indeed a bit messy, so let me rearrange it for you.
>
> From `git help rev-parse':
>
> r1...r2 is called symmetric difference of r1 and r2 and is
> defined as `r1 r2 --not $(git merge-base --all r1 r2)'. It is
> the set of commits that are reachable from either one of r1 or
> r2 but not from both.
>
> Then we have this from `git help log':
>
> --left-right
> Mark which side of a symmetric diff a commit is reachable
> from. Commits from the left side [(r1 above)] are prefixed with
> < and those from the right [(r2 above)] with>...
>
> which should explain what `<' and `>' mean in the following from
> `git help log':
>
> --left-only, --right-only
> List only commits on the respective side of a symmetric
> range, i.e. only those which would be marked< resp.> by
> --left-right.
>
> This is probably most useful with the following option, described
> in `git help log':
>
> --cherry-pick
> Omit any commit that introduces the same change as another
> commit on the "other side" when the set of commits are
> limited with symmetric difference.
>
> ...
>
> For example, --cherry-pick --right-only A...B omits those
> commits from B which are in A or are patch-equivalent to a
> commit in A. In other words, this lists the + commits from
> git cherry A B. More precisely, --cherry-pick --right-only
> --no-merges gives the exact list.
>
> That is, you often run into multiple commit objects that are unique
> because of, say, differing commit dates, but that actually introduce
> the same change to the source; this combination of options is helpful
> in weeding out commits that introduce the same change.
>
> If you're still confused, don't hesitate to poke the list some more;
> the documentation is quite lacking over all topics, so don't feel
> stupid.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-06 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-06 11:44 Question about right-only Tajti Ákos
2011-09-06 15:24 ` mfwitten
2011-09-06 15:42 ` Tajti Ákos [this message]
2011-09-06 16:08 ` Michael J Gruber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E663F62.7030603@intland.com \
--to=akos.tajti@intland.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfwitten@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).