From: "Frédéric Heitzmann" <frederic.heitzmann@gmail.com>
To: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, jaysoffian@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] git svn dcommit: new option --interactive.
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 22:02:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E67CDDC.1020305@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110906202601.GA11668@dcvr.yhbt.net>
Le 06/09/2011 22:26, Eric Wong a écrit :
> Frédéric Heitzmann<frederic.heitzmann@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Allow the user to check the patch set before it is commited to SNV. It is then
>> possible to accept/discard one patch, accept all, or quit.
>>
>> This interactive mode is similar with 'git send email' behaviour. However,
>> 'git svn dcommit' returns as soon as one patch is discarded.
>>
>> Part of the code was taken from git-send-email.perl
>> Thanks-to: Eric Wong<normalperson@yhbt.net> for the initial idea.
>> Signed-off-by: Frédéric Heitzmann<frederic.heitzmann@gmail.com>
> I agree with this feature, a few comments inline.
>
>> I would have preferred not duplicating the code snippets taken from
>> git-send-email ('ask' function, Term related code, ...) but I preferred not
>> to spoil Git.pm with it.
>> Any comment on a better way to factor perl code would be appreciated.
> We should put this into Git.pm at some point.
> (Somebody should refactor git-svn.perl into separate files too... :x)
>
>> Documentation/git-svn.txt | 8 +++++
>> git-svn.perl | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> Tests and feature should be the same patch
>> + return defined $default ? $default : undef
>> + unless defined $term->IN and defined fileno($term->IN) and
>> + defined $term->OUT and defined fileno($term->OUT);
> Things to make life easier for (mainly) C programmers:
>
> * Use C-style "&&" and "||" for conditionals. "and" and "or" are lower
> precedence and better used for control flow (see perlop(1) manpage).
>
> * Also, use parentheses for defined(foo) to disambiguate multiple
> conditions/statements.
>
My fault : I copied-pasted the 'ask' function from git-send-email.
Even if I rewrite it a litlle, it should not prevent anyone to mutalize
some code into Git.pm.
And, indeed, it will improve readability.
I wait a few days to see if anyone else has some comments and I send a
V2 patch serie.
Thanks for reviewing.
--
Fred
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-07 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-04 19:21 [PATCH] git svn dcommit : new option --interactive Frédéric Heitzmann
2011-09-04 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] git svn dcommit: " Frédéric Heitzmann
2011-09-06 20:26 ` Eric Wong
2011-09-07 20:02 ` Frédéric Heitzmann [this message]
2011-09-04 19:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] git svn dcommit: add a test serie for 'git svn dcommit --interactive' Frédéric Heitzmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E67CDDC.1020305@gmail.com \
--to=frederic.heitzmann@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jaysoffian@gmail.com \
--cc=normalperson@yhbt.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).