From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pascal Obry Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2011, #01; Tue, 4) Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:32:21 +0200 Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net Message-ID: <4E8DE625.2010103@obry.net> References: <7vvcs49ofl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4E8DC01A.8060406@obry.net> <7vlisy119i.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Reply-To: pascal@obry.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 06 19:32:33 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBro8-0006nE-IH for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:32:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964996Ab1JFRc0 convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:32:26 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:34141 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758729Ab1JFRcZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:32:25 -0400 Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so4624015wwf.1 for ; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.18.130 with SMTP id l2mr1390160wel.74.1317922344068; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (AVelizy-154-1-64-191.w83-199.abo.wanadoo.fr. [83.199.102.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z9sm11327000wbn.19.2011.10.06.10.32.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:32:22 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr-FR; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 In-Reply-To: <7vlisy119i.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Le 06/10/2011 19:24, Junio C Hamano a =E9crit : > The impression I got from the discussion was quite different, which w= as > that the patch was not even "good" by making certain things impossibl= e to > do by catering to a narrow corner case. I have understood that this was not completely fixing all=20 slash/backslash issues (is it even possible?) but in no way there was=20 regressions pointed out. At least a specific error *was* fixed. But I=20 may have missed something, in that case sorry. Pascal. --=20 --|------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member --| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE --|------------------------------------------------------ --| http://www.obry.net - http://v2p.fr.eu.org --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination" --| --| gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B